@heitner Iโd like to see the definition page. Is there an intention to close it? Or only the guise of โfixingโ with no teeth- par for the course with the NCAA as is.
Zero reason that entity should not fall within the definition of institution.
And letโs see the damages provisions.
Thursday night: HR
Friday night: HR
@Mets No. 3 prospect A.J. Ewing is adding some power to his already expansive set of skills for Double-A @RumblePoniesBB: https://t.co/cKPuX8oucv
@unusual_whales So, there is no way that happens. Trump must not be aware of how constitutional amendments get ratified. Congress isnโt voting for themselves to have term limits- and itโs nearly impossible that he would get support of 3/4 of the state legislatures.
@John_Fanta@John_Fanta Real question- why does everyone discussing a teamโs resume for inclusion mention their NET, when the committee has repeatedly said it is not a factor considered for inclusion?
@Brad_Wachtel Hi Brad, isnโt each game in a season treated equally for evaluating? It seems that for A&M the wins are being weighted more heavily than the losses here. Am I missing something? I know itโs not 1for1 but taking out a Q1/2W for each Q3L and itโs underwhelming. Love your work
@Brad_Wachtel@BrendonJennings Then why not just say the weakness is too many Q4 games/scheduling (the latter is routinely brought up by committee)? I get the Q1-Q3 metric- but it is a misnomer when analyzing PCโs resume and implies something that is not there when evaluating them.
@HilltopHoops_@ProCapFinder@BigLarryBabyArm Imagine paying $12.50 and taking time out of your day just to watch this joke of a basketball team with 10 other fans and not shout obscenities at leadership for the on-court product.
@jeffborzello @colbyfootbalfan For sure. Saturdayโs game @ Butler looks to be a massive opportunity for the Friars. If they get it, have to imagine a nice bump in NET, grabbing a Q1 Road win that could put them at 5 Q1s (~Top10 nationally pending other Saturday results)