Thank you to @usapromise for supporting my Constitutional Campaign Finance Reform Amendment. It’s time to curb the outsized role that money has in our elections and give the power back to the people.
U.S. Rep. Tom Barrett has introduced House Joint Resolution 191, a constitutional amendment to restore the authority of Congress and the states to set reasonable rules for money in elections while protecting free speech.
🔗https://t.co/erGuWc4ETu
50 years ago today, the Supreme Court launched the “money = free speech” theory.
It set a framework that has steadily narrowed what states & Congress can do to protect elections.
We polled Americans w/ Ipsos: only 15% agree that unlimited money = free speech. Majorities across parties reject that idea.
Learn more. 👇
1/ We partnered with Ipsos to conduct a nationally representative survey and found that only 15% of Americans believe unlimited campaign spending should be treated as free speech.
🧵
Citizens United turns 16, and critics say it unleashed a flood of dark money in elections. Maine leaders across parties are calling for a constitutional amendment to restore limits and put voters back at the center of democracy.
https://t.co/KDkruPFKe5
A new report from @SutherlandInst takes a hard look at how states lost the power to set rules around election spending — and why the For Our Freedom Amendment is needed to restore it, consistent with self-government.
Stay tuned for the final report, expected in mid-February.
More than $500 million of secret money donations to the leading nonprofit that helped Harris/Biden in 2024 came from just 10 donations.
One contribution was $97.5 million. Donor unknown.
@teddyschleifer has the tax filings —> https://t.co/EWNuNiRRp0
One donor gave $97.5 million to a nonprofit that gave $250 million to Kamala Harris's super PAC.
You'll never know who the donor is.
Hello to our campaign-finance system!
https://t.co/cOIhedO29Y
Just got out of oral arguments in NRSC v FEC. The elephant in the room that nobody talked about: whether the Court’s campaign finance jurisprudence is originalist. Check out my piece on @SCOTUSblog: https://t.co/vLDPXUZmGA
Over at @theammind - wrote about why the conservative legal movement of the future can't ignore a fundamental question: what, exactly, is the nature of the human being that's the subject of the law?
From antitrust to judicial selection to AI in court, this runs all the way down
I’m grateful to @Gekaminsky and @TheFP for including my perspective in their article on candidates who criticize billionaire influence while still relying on billionaire checks. The problem isn’t one side — both major parties are stuck in the same big-money system. 4/6
Justice Barrett’s book is terrific. From the chapter on federalism: “[T]he Court must be careful not to overread the Constitution to force a national rule.”
🚨Today, American Promise filed an amicus brief in NRSC v. FEC with the Supreme Court.
Our message is simple: campaign finance decisions belong to the American people and their lawmakers — not unelected judges. 🧵
📊 For the first time in U.S. history, @pewresearch finds that Americans rank money in politics as a top concern of “very big problems” facing the country — above the economy and terrorism.
Americans may be divided on many things — but on this, we are united.
That’s why momentum is building for the For Our Freedom Amendment. Hear our CEO @ClementsJeff on How to Fix It with @BulwarkOnline with @JohnAvlon 🎙️
"Pew Research now has reducing money in politics as the number one concern after the 2024 election." Could that cause be popular enough to propel a constitutional amendment?
@ClementsJeff joins @JohnAvlon in the latest episode of How To Fix It:
@OrinKerr This SSRN article has a refreshing take on the Constitutional mechanism for preserving popular sovereignty: the Article V amendment process. Uses proposed amendment to overturn SCOTUS campaign finance jurisprudence as example of how this works. https://t.co/bmiwEtYD3Q