@docpropergander@Devon_Eriksen_ Every disaster movie has a scene where the man comes home to his family and says pack 1 bag, we need to leave in ten minutes, and his woman fails by asking a plethora of stupid questions.
@honestduane Almost certainly not. If they wanted to sell it, strong keys are better. Keys this weak can only be explained by mind boggling levels of incompetence
@SCHIZO_FREQ Tbf, remarrying faster is not the same thing as recoupling faster. She may have a live-in bf the day after she leaves you, but she won’t marry him so quick because the moment she does, the alimony stops.
@StefanMolyneux It’s unfortunate that by the time women have accumulated enough wisdom to avoid terrible mistakes, they’re too old to benefit from it much personally. It’s almost like they’d be better off taking advice from older family members than doing whatever feels good in the moment.
@MichaelSLinden@asymmetricinfo A one-time tax to cover a recurring shortfall in a program riddled with fraud and waste? With no credible plan to address the fraud and waste? How can anyone believe it will be one time?
@asymmetricinfo There’s also a sense that it almost certainly won’t be the last. Any jurisdiction that would do this once will go back to the well. A wealth tax isn’t taking coins from Scrooge McDuck’s vault. It will force sale of assets. If it’s that disruptive anyway, why not just move?
@kangminlee Her own texts, and even more so, her own initial statement when she went to police. They heard her version of the facts and concluded there wasn’t probable cause to proceed with a criminal case.