My documentary on the Islamification of Birmingham has been demonetized on YouTube after reaching 600,000 views. So here is the entire video on X.
In the video, I'm told that it's okay to strike your wife if she's disobeying you. I'm told that I would have to leave the grocery store and go to the city center in order to be able to find a white person. I'm told that all women in the UK who cheat should be executed.
Thank you to @elonmusk for commenting on this video and allowing this content to be on X. If it weren't for X I genuinely think the west would have reached the point of no return already.
48 hours ago, it was revealed that 250,000 young British girls were raped, gang raped, drugged, and trafficked by Islamists in the UK.
Ian Carroll? Silent.
Candace Owens? Silent.
Cenk Uygur? Silent.
Mehdi Hasan? Silent.
Ana Kasparian? Silent.
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. ActBlue just PLED THE 5TH and REFUSED to answer about getting foreign donations infiltrating US politics on behalf of Democrats
She wouldn't even refute getting RUSSIAN money! 🤯
ActBlue is a FRAUD group. Shut it down!
REP. JIM JORDAN: Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud?
ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.
JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept?
ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.
JORDAN: How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia?
ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.
JORDAN: Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team?
ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.
JORDAN: Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards?
ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.
JORDAN: We won't keep you here all day, but let me just do one more. Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats?
ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.
Absolutely insane.
On election night in Los Angeles County, I pulled every statewide race directly from the California Secretary of State’s official results page. Same ballots. Same voters. Same night.
The governor’s race the most important, most advertised race on the entire ballot received roughly 100,000 fewer total votes than the controller and secretary of state races. On the same physical ballot.
The exact numbers from the official SOS website:
•Governor total votes: 796,467
•Controller total votes: 901,756
•Secretary of State total votes: 889,586
That means 105,289 more people voted for state controller than voted for governor. And 93,119 more people voted for secretary of state than voted for governor.
Do you know what the state controller does? Most people don’t. It is one of the most obscure offices on the ballot. Yet it got more votes than the race that determines who runs the largest state in America for the next four years.
All Republican governor candidates combined on election night: 222,712 votes
Republican controller candidate (Herb Morgan): 302,552 votes
Republican secretary of state candidate (Don Wagner): 291,650 votes
That means roughly 70,000 to 80,000 people voted Republican in the controller and secretary of state races but did not cast a Republican vote for governor on the same ballot.
These are not different ballots. These are not different voters. This is one piece of paper. Governor is at the TOP. Controller and secretary of state are further DOWN.
People don’t undervote on the top ballot. They undervote on the bottom ballot.
How does this make any sense?
What am I missing people who are smarter than me?
I have already lost my job.
I have already lost my income.
I have already lost my benefits.
Why?
Because I said I stood with Israel and it sent Muslim faculty, administration and the Muslim Students Association into a frothing rage.
All at a public Canadian university.
My university invented defamation to destroy my reputation and let it run for two years and then admitted quietly it was false.
But nobody cares about retractions - they care about the juicy gossip. Lies do not have a reverse gear.
I have already spent two and a half years fighting alone because the union Opseu 562 - I paid roughly $15,000 in dues to - refused to represent me.
Opseu hates Israel. Their president is a radical BDS supporter.
Now my dues pay for their lawyers to harass and insult me at the Ontario Labour Board.
So here is the question.
Why are Humber College, the University of Guelph-Humber, OPSEU, and their lawyers still fighting to make sure that I am denied severance?
Why spend millions to avoid paying out a fraction of that?
Because OPSEU and Humber College’s hatred of Israel is that extreme.
OPSEU’s executive member was recently caught saying they wish they could have participated in the Holocaust. Look it up yourself. https://t.co/ELDfQI8JTD
The College?
Their faculty publically calls Jews subhuman, devil worshippers and advocates for the destruction of Israel and the murder of nine million Israelis.
See link below. I saved a small fraction before they could delete it. I posted a couple.
It is a tax payer funded ideological crusade against one man.
I added it up. They have 11 people fighting me. It’s a hell of an email queue.
Most are paid about $800 an hour. On the taxpayer dime.
The individuals whose actions are at the center of this controversy do not have to personally defend their decisions. They don’t have to even attend.
The institutions do it for them. They send tax payer funded pit bull lawyers to fight one person.
I have no lawyer.
But Opseu and the U of Guelph and Humber are terrified.
Because if one ordinary unremarkable person can successfully challenge powerful institutions, those institutions become accountable.
It is that simple.
https://t.co/SXu13GNedi
The U of Guelph Humber has seen a 25% enrolment decline, they have amongst the lowest entry requirements in Ontario, they are now one of the worst universities in Ontario.
The university needs to save money for their ideological crusades.
Perhaps they need more money for Palestinian flags on stage at graduation.
It’s extraordinary - a university that doesn’t focus on learning but on radicalism.
If you hate Israel and want an easy degree go there.
But this case is no longer about one professor.
It is about establishing what views are acceptable and unacceptable within Ontario academia and organized labour.
The institutions involved have spent years fighting to ensure they never have to admit wrongdoing, never have to compensate the person they targeted, and never have to acknowledge that what happened to a pro-Israel voice might have been wrong.
That is why the fight continues.
Not because I have power.
Not because I have resources.
Not because I have lawyers.
But because if one ordinary person can successfully challenge powerful institutions, those institutions become accountable.
Eleven people against one.
Please don’t say it’s not my problem and let it go.
Today they attack me.
Tomorrow they may come after you or your loved one.
Speak truth to power. GoFundMe link below. Not started by me.
Please repost.
If this is not confronted Jewish faculty, staff and students will never be safe at the U of Guelph Humber.
https://t.co/PREv3gE5nk
https://t.co/pn9FVIQfpv
#Ontario #AcademicFreedom #IsraelResilience #LabourRelations
#Ontario #OPSEU #Israel #LabourRelations @adl@GuelphHumberUni@HumberPoly@GadSaad@DouglasKMurray@BenMulroney@benshapiro
The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.
Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.
Wow! Thomas Massie FINALLY acknowledged accepting Mullah Moolah from a family of Jihadists! A commenter replied to him with the screenshot of him receiving tens of thousands from the notorious leftist family, the Mahrouqs! His response? 👇
"Oh wow, an entire family that donates to candidates opposed to genocide in Gaza."
The problem is, he's accepted over $200k from Jihadists who hate all that America stands for.
As I finish updating the database over the next 2 days, I will produce a full report of where this money comes from here on @TrackIslamUSA!
Mr @elonmusk and @nikitabier, Candace Owens doxxed @LauraLoomer which I thought was a Twitter safety violation, why is Candace Owens allowed to remain on this app when smaller accounts have been suspended for less?