I understand why people are requesting federal law-enforcement engagement in the MMTLP situation. If Next Bridge has truly exhausted every other avenue, a criminal referral may be the only option left. But I believe everyone should proceed with extreme caution and first ask: Is this truly the only remaining remedy?
Once information is turned over to federal law enforcement, it largely becomes a one-way street. You provide the evidence, but investigators generally provide little—if anything—in return. You may not know whom they are investigating, what conduct they are examining, whether charges will ever be filed, or how long the process will take. It could be three, four, five years—or longer—and shareholders would have virtually no control over the direction or timing.
There is another serious concern: if federal grand jury subpoenas begin being served, the wagons may start circling. Witnesses and potential defendants retain attorneys, communications shut down, and some people may invoke their Fifth Amendment rights. That could complicate or delay parallel civil litigation, discovery, and other potential civil remedies. A criminal investigation does not automatically stop a civil case, but parties may seek stays or resist discovery to avoid affecting the criminal matter.
We also need to understand the difference between criminal restitution and a civil or market-based recovery. Federal restitution is generally based on a victim’s provable, actual financial loss caused by the charged criminal conduct—not hypothetical market value, potential short-squeeze pricing, a missed corporate event, or what the shares might have been worth under different circumstances. I am not saying that to be negative or dismissive; that is simply how federal criminal restitution generally works.
Other concerns include whether civil limitation periods continue running, the government’s complete discretion over whether to investigate or prosecute, the higher burden of proof in a criminal case, and whether convicted defendants would even have sufficient assets to satisfy a restitution order. A referral guarantees none of these things: an investigation, charges, a conviction, restitution, or an actual recovery.
After waiting several more years, shareholders could still receive nothing—or perhaps only some portion of their documented loss. No one truly knows.
I am not opposed to law-enforcement involvement. If crimes occurred, those responsible should absolutely be held accountable. I am simply saying that this is an enormous step with potentially irreversible consequences. Before surrendering control to a process that may become secret, lengthy, and beyond shareholders’ influence, we should be certain that every viable civil, regulatory, congressional, and corporate remedy has genuinely been exhausted.
Proceed with extreme caution and ask the most important question: Is this truly the only remaining path?
@808CG1@TheTrndisuFrnd
MMTLP Trended for 3 days in a row on X. Please Sign the Letter that was given to you by your Administration @Potus. It would absolutely help Midterm Elections while simultaneously helping Veterans, Veteran Families and Thousands of Others who have been Shafted by the System 👊🏼🇺🇸
@IRONAPE_MMTLP@CHELLESHOCKEDTM@annvandersteel@busybrands
This issue has hurt and affected so many of our veterans.
Full transparency on MMTLP is long overdue…no more silence from the SEC or FINRA.
@realDonaldTrump
Please sign that letter.
Our veterans deserve answers and accountability. #MMTLP #Veterans #Transparency
MMTLP SHOUT OUT TO @EleanorTerrett (fOXBusiness news ) for her bold reporting on MMTLP! She’s calling out the SEC & FINRA for stonewalling media & Congress, exposing a serious regulatory issue. Keep pushing for transparency! FINRAFRAUD. Time to investigate FINRA CEO robert W Cook.
America First means Main Street first. I’m calling on President Trump to stand with $MMTLP investors, including veterans and military families. Wall Street cannot have one set of rules while hardworking Americans get another. Sign the letter. Expose the truth. Deliver justice.
https://t.co/AWLoy32Zob
Like 👍 this post if you want to see @annvandersteel on the @cvpayne show to discuss $MMTLP, Naked Short Selling, and the Market Manipulators like Citadel🚨🚨 @johnnaarintl
Byron Donalds got $10M from Ken Griffin of Citadel.
Citadel is named in a lawsuit by the #MMTLP US Bankruptcy Trustee and Doug Collins, a MMTLP investor.
Both victims of naked short selling and spoofing.
Byron Donalds told the MMTLP Community he would address this, and now, SILENCE.
@Paul_Renner held a space last week and spoke to the MMTLP community. As a prosecutor he said he hates bullies.
Renner Won’t Back Down.
Get ready. The 2027 Governor’s Mansion is going to be fire!
@palikaras The more that is revealed regarding the specific partnerships that META® forged, the more enraging it is that both the company was strategically attacked externally with market manipulation & internally from corrupt leadership staging hostile takeover/takedown (Jack Harding & co)
🦋 $MMAT — DOC. 2936
The Board was discussed extensively—but not sued. (Yet?)
The sole defendant is 24M Technologies, and the requested relief concerns recovery of the transferred Optodot/NPORE assets or their value.
So why devote so much of the complaint to the Board’s alleged conduct? 👀
Strategically, those allegations may:
⚖️ Support intent, insolvency, and inadequate-value allegations
💰 Trace where the sale proceeds allegedly went
🧭 Establish a factual roadmap for separate Board-related claims
🛡️ Lay groundwork for potential D&O insurance recovery
What might come next?
🔹 Fiduciary-duty or fraud claims
🔹 Unjust enrichment or disgorgement
🔹 Contract-based recovery
🔹 D&O insurance claims
🔹 Claim objections, offsets, or referrals
⏳ Potential limitation windows:
• New avoidance actions: likely closed after Aug. 10, 2026, absent tolling, relation back, or another exception
• Fiduciary duty/fraud: potentially 2027 or later
• Unjust enrichment/civil RICO: potentially 2028
• Written-contract claims: potentially 2030
• D&O coverage: policy-specific—and potentially urgent
The question is not merely what Doc. 2936 requests today. It is: What does this detailed Board narrative signal—and what might be filed next?
⚠️ Allegations remain unproven. Dates are estimates and may change based on accrual, discovery, tolling, policy terms, or sealed filings. Not legal advice.