Extinction Rebellion shut down London and police danced alongside them. Protest illegal migration and you're immediately smeared as “far right”. Millions of decent Britons can see the double standard. And they're sick of it.
Saying this in a personal capacity, as an English woman bloody fed up with the current state of operations….
What used to pass for charitable work has been twisted into a vehicle for the left’s NGO network to drag this country down.
Independent auditors have already shown how deeply these organisations are stacked with people who hold open contempt for us, pouring money into open‑border activism, gender‑ideology theatrics, ethnic‑minority lobby outfits and the usual counter‑protests and virtue signalling aimed squarely at the British public.
Meanwhile, a couple of fantastic gentlemen I know have spent months fighting through legal hurdles to set up Britain’s first pro‑British, openly nativist NGO.
It’s approved, legitimate and already backed by serious supporters. Their mission is simple. Wyvern is dedicated to the English, Scottish, Northern Irish and Welsh, no one else, no distractions.
It’s entirely not‑for‑profit and every penny raised goes straight back into the organisation, into real community support, into helping people who need a hand, or into charities like the Rhiannon Whyte Foundation and groups supporting Pakistani rape‑gang survivors.
I’m really looking forward to their achievements with this! Well done, it’s about time!
Go give them a follow!
(Again, a personal endorsement only I add!)
Coaches were ready, the clothing , food and security were ready.
Who in Government knew they’d be mass arrivals in the south coast yesterday?
THIS IS A STATE SPONSORED RACKET.
No, it's not racist, it's culturalist
And some cultures are superior in the light on British
values
We don't like child marriage, stoning women, clitoral mutilation, throwing gays off high buildings, torturing
animals, and systematic inflation of the male ego
@TiceRichard You and Nigel are very quickly unravelling Reform - I hope a lot of people are jumping ship (no pun intended) as a result of your comments over the weekend. What a disappointment to the British working people you are, after promising them so much. Shame on you!
🚨🚨IMPORTANT UPDATE: LEGAL STRATEGY MIGRANT CRIME
Over the past week I have met with several powerful lawyers and legal groups based in both the UK and Strasbourg about the work we have already been doing on migrant crime statistics.
The research operation is now substantial.
We have coordinated mass FOI efforts, audited constabularies across the country, gathered crime data, examined disclosure practices and built out the underlying research needed to understand what information police forces actually hold.
There is also work underway around the ECHR and the wider legal framework governing disclosure, public accountability and access to this data.
I have also spoken with the Centre for Migration Control @migrationCtrl.
They have a solid legal strategy around holding the Government to account and migrant crime statistics release sorted.
Our role is to provide any data, research and evidence generated through this national auditing effort so that it can feed directly into that wider legal strategy, if and where needed.
Please stay tuned for announcements from the Centre for Migration Control themselves.
There is considerably more already in motion than I am able to discuss publicly at this stage.
🚨 PIDDINGTON: 1,256 OR 3,510? THIS GOVERNMENT MUST EXPLAIN.
Piddington is a beautiful rural village of around 370 residents, including just 46 children.
Yet the Government wants accommodation for up to 1,256 single adult men at MOD Bicester Site A for potentially 10 years — around 3.4 times the population of the entire village.
This is not an existing accommodation site. It is a former storage and distribution site with no residential units currently there.
Now, buried within 1,000+ pages of supporting documents only made public last Wednesday, a Government Property Agency UXO Risk Assessment dated 31 March 2026 refers TWICE to accommodation for 3,510 service users.
To be clear: I am NOT saying 3,510 is the current proposal. The current application says 1,256.
But where did 3,510 come from? Was it an error, an earlier capacity assumption, or was accommodation for 3,510 ever considered?
3,510 would be almost TEN TIMES Piddington’s population.
Even 1,256 would fundamentally change the character and scale of this tiny community — and in my view, it would be completely wrong.
3,510 would be devastating.
So we need one clear answer:
WHERE DID 3,510 COME FROM — AND WHAT DID IT RELATE TO?
Piddington deserves transparency. Piddington deserves to be heard. 🇬🇧
@ShabanaMahmood@ukhomeoffice@andyburnham@CMcKinnellMP@AlexJJNorris@PiddingtonRoars@W4Restore@RestoreBritain@RupertLowe10