Bringonthejamsmutherfuker

A dick

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@theJeremyVine bet there will be some moron in this thread that posts that video where the bike lane is full of people or people walking out in front of moving cyclists or has a bunch of twat kids being dicks on it oh wait @UkPolitoons did it.

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@OpenChiswickW4 @JohnJohnStewart @harryrose28 @s_walthamstow @KeithHavers @Avebury_stones @EricEatsPickles guessing harry is still waiting for his balls to drop. S70GAD would probably be interested in him

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@VincentStops @willnorman Not recognising the research isn't a methodological rebuttal. Which findings do you dispute, and why?

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@VincentStops @willnorman Neither study proves £1.5bn was value for money. That requires a comprehensive economic appraisal.
But nor can you conclude £1.5bn achieved "very little" simply because London-wide casualties increased.

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@VincentStops @willnorman Otherwise, we're confusing correlation with causation.

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@VincentStops @willnorman Agreed. The increase in serious injuries deserves investigation. But rising London wide KSIs don't establish that individual safety schemes have failed.
We need to examine collision types, locations, cycling exposure and changes in risk, then compare treated roads with controls.

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@forever_the_dee @MarkEDenton @OpenChiswickW4 @grok yet millions more go without being caught.

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@arleneseesit @PeteWray11 on narrow blind corner roads no it wouldn't be but that isn't the roads you are talking about it is.

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@arleneseesit @PeteWray11 you really didn't look at those images did you. two abreast makes it shorter to overtake. You can only overtake when safe to do so. If you can't over take two you aren't going to be able to overtake one. If the motorist is frustrated that is their issue

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@MaCgroupUK @ChimeraX2021 I'm muting you. Not because you've won an argument, but because life's too short to keep explaining basic evidence to someone so spectacularly committed to misunderstanding it.

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@MaCgroupUK @ChimeraX2021 Debating you is like playing chess with a pigeon: you knock over the pieces, shit on the board and strut around convinced you've won.

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@MaCgroupUK @ChimeraX2021 yet you can't show any economics of how it will save taxpayers money

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@MaCgroupUK @ChimeraX2021 You keep demanding information that's publicly available while refusing to identify a single error in the research.
Are you actually reading the replies, or just recycling the same accusations because you can't substantiate them? 😂

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@MaCgroupUK @ChimeraX2021 I've already given you the authors' names. Jamie Furlong, David Fevyer, Ben Armstrong, Phil Edwards, Rachel Aldred and Anna Goodman authored the 2025 LTN casualty study.
I've also provided the sample sizes, methodology and findings.

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@MaCgroupUK @ChimeraX2021 You've repeatedly alleged manipulated data without identifying a single incorrect calculation, exclusion or statistical method.
If you've proven the researchers wrong, demonstrate precisely how. Otherwise, repeatedly declaring yourself right isn't evidence. 😂

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@MaCgroupUK @ChimeraX2021 Then quote where I claimed no LTN ever caused congestion or was removed. You can't, because I explicitly acknowledged both.
I've provided studies, sample sizes, methodologies and findings, including limitations.

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@MaCgroupUK @ChimeraX2021 Meanwhile, I've repeatedly asked you to identify the GLA or TfL report supporting your claims. Your response is "Google it".

Interesting how you demand precise evidence from others while refusing to supply any yourself. 😂

[Bringonthejamsmutherfuker @Bringonthejams]

@MaCgroupUK @ChimeraX2021 2026 journey-time study: Laverty et al.
2026 pollution study: Khreis et al.
All published in peer-reviewed journals, with their methodologies available for scrutiny.
Now, are you challenging their data, calculations or conclusions? Name the specific error.