@srulibroocker@DefiyantlyFree My dad always said, after three kids it’s really all the same. There were six of us and the oldest and youngest were 7 years apart.
This is a superficial and ultimately destructive way of framing the problem.
Women deal with the profound biological burden of reproduction: menstruation, pregnancy, childbirth, and menopause. That is real, costly, and non-negotiable. No serious person denies it.
But the complementary burden that has fallen on men for the entire history of our species is equally non-negotiable and far more lethal.
Men have been the ones who die in war — by the tens of millions. Conscription, combat, and the obligation to stand between the tribe and existential threat have been almost exclusively male responsibilities.
Men occupy the overwhelming majority of the most dangerous occupations on the planet: commercial fishing, logging, mining, roofing, heavy construction, oil-rig work, long-haul trucking. The workplace fatality statistics are not subtle. Year after year, 90–95 % of occupational deaths are male.
Men also take more physical and psychological risks. That is why they invent more, explore more, and die younger — from accidents, from violence, from suicide. The male suicide rate is not a minor footnote; it is a catastrophic and chronic reality.
These are not interchangeable complaints. They are complementary sacrifices. One sex carries the primary cost of creating new life. The other sex carries the primary cost of protecting that life and extracting the resources necessary to sustain it from a dangerous and indifferent world.
To reduce the entire male side of this ancient division of labour to “what do men deal with?” as if the answer were “nothing of consequence” is not compassion. It is a deliberate refusal to look at the hierarchical and sacrificial structure of reality itself.
The proper response is not grievance. It is gratitude for the complementary burdens that have kept the species alive, and the individual responsibility to carry one’s own share of them without self-pity.
Jordan Peterson’s answer to “what’s the point of marriage if we can already have kids together” was simple: children.
Not just the ones you have now, the whole multi-generational thing, including grandchildren. Marriage is the public way of saying this is serious and long-term.
He pointed out that “as long as we love each other and we’re happy” doesn’t survive forty years. There will be long stretches where you’re not happy and the love feels thin. That’s when the vow matters, the “come hell or high water” part. And hell and high water are coming.
The real question is whether this is the person you actually want in the boat with you when things fall apart.
I’ve had enough of this bullsh*t. DHS should round up every one of these dangerous Islamists who threaten us and our country, insisting on destroying and eliminating anyone or anything in their way, and remove them.
Americans need to know the truth behind the story Zohran Mamdani used to say America needs to accept mass migration
Zohran Mamdani said “I consider my own faith, Islam, a religion built upon a narrative of migration. The story of the Hijra reminds us that Prophet Muhammad was a stranger too, who fled Mecca and was welcomed in Medina."
Here’s the part that he left out and it’s VERY important
- Muhammad started his religion in Mecca, where he made about 70 converts until the citizens of Mecca literally chased him out of the city
- So he fled from Mecca to Medina, which was a mostly Jewish city that was occupied and controlled by 3 opposing Jewish tribes
- He then he made a treaty with the Jewish tribes, establishing himself for the first time as a political leader. So Muhammad continued to gain followers and grow politically and militarily until he eventually got big enough and strong enough that he just decided, "Well, I don't have to follow these treaties anymore." And so for two of the tribes, he voided the treaty, and he cast them out. He expelled them out of Medina.
- The final tribe that was still in Medina, he brought all of the men from the tribe into the middle of the city and beheaded them and then all of the women and the children from the tribe were either sold off or brought into slavery
Now this is the story that Zohran Mamdani references. “Prophet Muhammad was a stranger too, who fled Mecca and was welcomed in Medina."
Yeah, except for within 5 years, Muhammad had killed, enslaved or expelled every Jew from Medina
Zohran Mamdani literally used this story as his reasoning to say we need to accept mass migration
The story ends with mass murder of the native people and the compelled takeover of the land by Muslims
That’s our future
My full speech at the @OxfordUnion debating whether the west is right to be suspicious of Islam.
I needed a security team to attend and we were spat at, bullied and heckled by a baying mob.
But I will not give up on free speech.
I will not submit.
Immodesty is deeper than clothing.
We often reduce “immodesty” to short skirts, low necklines, or tight fits as if the issue begins and ends with sexual appeal. Scripture points to something more fundamental. Immodesty is rooted in pride: the craving to be noticed, admired, and set apart as special. It is the heart’s desire to stand out, to draw eyes, and to secure significance through external display.
That desire can wear many outfits.
It can appear in expensive brands flaunted for status.
It can appear in deliberately provocative dress.
It can appear in loud, attention-seeking speech or social-media performance.
It can even appear in the opposite extreme: ostentatious “modesty” worn as a badge of superiority.
In every case the root is the same: “Look at me.” Pride seeks glory for the self rather than reflecting the glory of God.
The cure is not a longer list of rules. Legalism (measuring holiness by hemlines, fabric choices, or external checklists) cannot change the heart. It only rearranges the symptoms while leaving the pride intact. Rules may restrain behavior for a season, but they cannot produce genuine humility or godliness.
True change comes through sanctification which is the ongoing work of the Holy Spirit conforming us to the image of Christ. This is received by faith, not earned by performance. As we trust the finished work of Jesus, the Spirit steadily dethrones pride, reorients our desires, and teaches us to find our identity and worth in Him rather than in the applause of others. Outward modesty then becomes the natural fruit of an inward transformation, not the anxious product of rule-keeping.
We do not overcome the desire to be seen by trying harder to hide. We overcome it by fixing our eyes on the One who saw us, loved us, and gave Himself for us, until the need to stand out fades in the light of His glory.
Bill Maher’s audience audibly gasps when he reads what the Democratic Socialists of America are actually saying out loud:
MAHER: “Trump has told 1 trillion lies, but when he says the DSA are actually COMMUNISTS, that’s not one of them.”
“And it’s not hard to prove it just by quoting the DSA and their candidates.”
“J.D. Vance was on the show, and I told him that if the Democratic Party keeps going in the direction of the DSA, my vote was in play. And all I heard all vacation was, ‘Oh, my God, you’re a Republican now.’ No, that's not what I said. I said in play, and here’s why.”
“Because not a week goes by where I don’t read about some newly chosen, exciting new face in the Democratic Party. And then when that face opens its mouth, the Communist Manifesto or some other crazy shit comes out! Again.”
“Let’s just read the quotes. The DSA platform says: ‘You work as much as you are able and no more than needed.’ If that was any closer to Karl Marx’s dictum, from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs, they’d be sued for plagiarism.”
“New York Mayor Mamdani once tweeted, Karl Marx’s words exactly. They’re not trying to hide it. Their most popular influencer, Hasan Piker, thinks communism is so groovy, he laments the fall of two of the most murderous regimes in history, the Soviet Union and Chairman Mao's China.”
“Mamdani's aide, his top aide, Cea Weaver, said, ‘If you don't believe in the government's sacred right to seize property, it's over.’ And ‘impoverish the white middle class.’ What? That's a goal? You know you're supposed to scare people into voting for you, right?”
“One of the new, soon-to-be Democratic congresspeople, Darlesia Chavalier, supports seizing all properties from landlords and said, ‘Seize the means of production.’ Mamdani has said ‘The end goal is seizing the means of production.’ I think they want to seize the means of production.”
“Now, maybe you missed that in school or missed school altogether, but THAT'S COMMUNISM.”
“Now the coalition within the DSA called the Marxist Unity Group is in ascendance. And I must take them at their word. When their words include, ‘Our commitment is to the long-term struggle for a fully liberated classless society. In a word, communism.’”
“What do they have to do, tweet out ‘Elect more communists’? Oh, yeah, Cea Weaver did that.”
[Shows tweet, audience audibly gasps]
“Yes, [she really did that]! ... People gotta realize this is going on.”
The fact that liberals don’t care about this reveals that they don’t have the values they pretend to have. They have a war they want to win and maybe they don’t even know what they are fighting for.