@SarahAnnHopper1@EducationLaw2 Students are protected by the First Amendment, however, they are not allowed to "freely" advocate during instructional time. If students were allowed to freely express themselves during instructional time, no learning would take place. @EducationLaw2#educationlaw2
@BowenShanta@EducationLaw2 Interestingly, students have freedom of speech but they cannot express it freely. However, some students may take advantage of expressing speech freely that it may interrupt class time. I think it is important to have regulations for that reason. @EducationLaw2#educationlaw2
@EducationLaw2 Because of the 1st Amendment, students have the right to express/ advocate their beliefs at school as long as it is non-disruptive. The 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of speech/press. However, many students' speech is regulated during school time. @EducationLaw2#educationlaw2
@SamFarias934@EducationLaw2 Yes, if parents are willing to put in the time and effort, homeschooling can be equivalent. However, the parents who do not do this are risking putting their student in danger of falling behind academically. @EducationLaw2#educationlaw2
@Allison80457413@EducationLaw2 After our country witnessed online learning and home based learning, I believe homeschooling can be considered equivalent to in-school learning. Parents are more aware of the resources available to teach their kid(s) state standards at home. @EducationLaw2#educationlaw2
@EducationLaw2 Depending on resources the student is learning at home, homeschooling can be considered equivalent instruction. If students are learning legit information on their learning level by referring to the state standards and objectives, it is equivalent. @EducationLaw2#educationlaw2
@katelynmoore78 @EducationLaw2 I also support the zero-reject philosophy. In my opinion, I also believe all students should have the same options. Do you think more school systems exclude or include students with disabilities? @EducationLaw2#educationlaw2
@EducationLaw2 I agree it may look different for each child. However, I do not believe any child should be excluded. I support the philosophy because a child with disabilities should have the same options/ benefits as a child without. @EducationLaw2#educationlaw2