@TheBabylonBee It's not to get out of California, it's to force their way into Red States so Red Californians can out buy all those cheap Red State houses...
So if Western Values and Ideals are ;
Individualism and Personal Autonomy: The individual possessing rights to self-determination, privacy, and personal expression.
Liberty and Fundamental Rights: Protection of personal freedoms, including free speech, freedom of religion and conscience, freedom of assembly, and freedom of the press.
The Rule of Law and Equality Under the Law: The concept that laws apply equally to every citizen, regardless of rank, wealth, or station, and that government authority is bounded by constitutional constraints rather than arbitrary rule.
Democracy and Government by Consent: Political authority derives legitimacy from the consent of the governed, typically exercised through representative institutions, multi-party elections, and institutional checks and balances.
Rationalism, Secularism, and Empiricism: Public policy, science, and law are ideally guided by critical inquiry, verifiable evidence, and open debate rather than dogma, religious authority, or inherited tradition.
Economic Liberty and Property Rights: Legal recognition of private ownership, enforceable contracts, and market-based economies where individuals can pursue enterprise, commerce, and innovation.
So exactly who is immigrating legally or illegally) here that doesn't agree with this?
@DeadReckoningTr@QuantumGuard17 Go for it. Just to set the baseline for you to beat, my netting out claims there's a definite improvement, but it is so small, that it is negligibly worthless.
I look forward to seeing what you find.
Love it! You are argumentatively correct in all of your justifications IN FAVOR OF, the technological realities of Musk's (unarguably) mighty endeavors.
He certainly has a big wallet. His big appetite goes without saying.
But you haven't (effectively) netted out the TOTAL value against the TOTAL cost, to convince me all of this is worthwhile. Keep in mind as a species we're supposed to evolve. Not stagnate.
If EVs result in SIGNIFICANTLY less or a SIGNIFICANT reduction in overall fossil fuel consumption, I'm for it.
They don't.
If better made better technology Chinese EV's were allowed in the US with high tariffs to compensate for Chinese Government attempts to undercut pricing (like usual), in order to create more Capitalism competition, and weren't actually conveniently blocked to give Tesla a politically favored monopoly, I'm for it.
They aren't.
If Starlink was unblockable, was a regulated public utility, didn't pollute the Earth's orbit, or was out of the way of Astronomy, I'm for it.
It isn't.
If SpaceX offered any chance of actual real useful Space travel or colonization, and wasn't merely a returned favor and political gratitude for Musk's heavyweight thumb on the scale, I'm for it.
It isn't.
If a single Robot can pick a strawberry better (and faster) than a human for LESS THAN $4 a basket, in HIGH temperatures, I'm for it.
They can't.
If Neuralink could actually work long term, glitch-free, and not be immediately rejected by the body's natural immune systems, I'm for it.
It can't.
Certainly ALL of these are worthwhile "Hobbies" for an obscenely rich hobbyist who likes to tinker in his garage. But I (respectfully) object to their attempted market capitalization and commercialization by calling them successful.
You also didn't address the deeper, and far greater concerning impacts of Twitter being a proven commercial disinformation platform.
You also skimmed over the impact of directly interfering with the Democratic process by attempting to buy the disinformation of public opinion, and steer it towards favorable election results, in return for securing (backroom?) lucrative contracts from helping the winning side gain political and administrative purchasing power.
I would also add to the discussion, the fact that Musk is allegedly medicating with mood altering drugs, and recently has been reported to be "sad".
If true (and we both know it vety likely is), this is not a good combination to be including in anyone's short or long term stock portfolio strategy.
Nevermind it's definitely not a Buy, or even a Hold. As the market is now beginning to show, it is an immediate Sell.
Patient: "Dr. Bot?
Robot Surgeon: "Yes?"
Patient: "Uh you're fully charged right? You're not going to like run out of juice in the middle of my surgery right?"
Robot Surgeon: "Do not worry Human. I am at 47%. Statistically that is more than sufficient for your quadruple bypass."
Patient: "But... Wait..."
Robot Surgeon: "Count backwards from 100... Good By...llurfurblerflerbloop."
Tesla/SpaceX Service Repair Mechanic bursts into the OR, "Quick! Plug him in! Huh? What do you mean you have the wrong adapter!!!"
Robot Surgeon: "Connect to Charger... Connect to Charger... Connect to Charger..."
I think it makes sense to do these robot surgeries on a SpaceX OR in orbit so that you wouldn't hear all the screaming..
Once again, acolytes "sitting around camp", watching the monkey dance by the fire. My God look at him! He seems almost human!
What's the value? And at what cost?
EVs are not an ecological free lunch: opening open-pit mines, processing battery chemicals, and generating terawatt-hours of electricity all impose real environmental costs.
In the first Developed World people are swapping gas engine cars for EVs. But in the Developing 3rd World EVs are being added to the fleet. Not tefucung has engine cars. Most of the 3rd World relies on coal plants for energy and their demand for electricity is rising not falling.
So a bit, but not all that much value. For a very high cost.
Starlink is slow. And polluting the orbit of the Earth preventing telescopes from researching into Space requiring telescopes be sent out past Starlink. That's slow Internet getting in the way of science. Starlink can be easily blocked by rogue states do the impact on Freedom is arguable.
So a bit, but not all that much value. For a very high cost.
SpaceX is merely Uber for NASA. I'm not sure what value there is in going back to the moon. We can't mine it. We can't live there. Same goes for Mars except we know we privzbky won't survive the trip there, nevermind set up a base, nevermind return to earth. The suggestions we can are ludicrous when you look at the facts.
So almost no value. For a very high cost.
That leaves neuralink, robots, and Twitter.
Neuralink is reprogramming the brain. So I kind of need that regulated.
Robots are expensive, can't lift 50lbs, or work more than a few hours before needing to be charged. I thought we were trying to get rid of breaks!
That leaves Twitter. Which is utterly worthless but still a HUGE social liability.
So those are the products and services and engineering balancing their costs with their benefits.
Is it worth it? Is it worth creating one person a Trillionaire capable of changing elections and governments to suit their needs?
I personally don't think so. Does what I think matter? Arguably.
@5337h3@QuantumGuard17 I definitely have full blows EDS. It's apparent very contagious, and spreading. Because a lot of people have it. I think even Musk might have it, I just read today that he's apparently sad and not happy...๐ข
@DeadReckoningTr@QuantumGuard17 Oh, my Bias is a direct result of the Logic. Today WE read that the richest man in the history of the world isn't "Happy". So...
I'm very proud to announce a project I've been working on for the last 5 years is ready!
"Last American DJ in Tehran" is the true story of an American radio DJ who became an unlikely cultural ambassador in 1970s Iran, forging friendships and memories that survived revolution, exile, and nearly half a century of political division.
Includes over 100 pages of rare photos.
Now available worldwide on Amazon.
https://t.co/2CDnM4tjxS
What's the advance? Surveillance satellites? A Slow starlink internet Monopoly?
NASA decided to privatize it's launch and payload deliveries. So it can focus on bigger projects. SpaceX is a subcontractor.
NASA developed the rocket technology over 70 years. SpaceX merely picked up after NASA's proving.
SpaceX has crashed 40 rockets. Even more second stages.
SpaceX is an Uber that NASA calls when it needs a ride to the Space Station.
SpaceX has not successfully launched a Moon mission. Even if it does. It will be as a service NASA hires it for.
If you want to compare NASA to SpaceX, SpaceX would need to successfully land people on the moon and bring them back.
Musk is promising this. And he's raising money on his promise. Doing it is another thing.
I don't think he can.
@bvx6x@DavidMKeyes So employees of a company run by a "mad scientist" no surprisingly like the mad scientist?
Ask the people who've quit Musk's companies.
If their NDAs allow them.
Sorry. Musk is smart. But no genius. Certainly he's no saint either.
@TheBabylonBee There you. Now I can follow. Much funnier than your attempts at political humor. Politics while hilarious nowadays, simply isn't funny. Stick to this. Abandon the other.