Doing defensive paper writing with GPT is just depressing.
Immediately realized all the ragebaiting reviews I got from NeurIPS were just straight out from GPT since I see the exact same non-sense weaknesses again.
Yet you still need to play this game. The problem is never the flood of AI slops, it's that the same powerful AI tool that can be used as a reviewer.
How can anyone oppose a ban on something that could destroy humanity? This definition is chillingly precise - count me in favor. #AISafety#Superintelligence
AI companies are nowhere near ready to handle superintelligent AI. I support banning it and I think this definition is pretty good: "AI that exceeds human cognitive performance and capabilities across most domains, or has sufficient capabilities to destroy or disempower humanity"
@Faizu_Coder A full 90-day roadmap for free? That's wild. But honestly, how many of those 7 prompts actually lead to real revenue versus just more planning?
@gokulr Revenue can be bought but loyalty from AI-native companies can't be manufactured - sharp point. But how do you measure undying loyalty in practice?