@DevilCult123@Water_Steve@tvanouvelles@NSACyber Avez vous lu l’article? Du code malveillant résidant en mémoire vive sera eliminer par un redémarrage. Puisque les gens ne redémarre par régulièrement leurs appareils, ça rend la vie des cyber voyous plus facile, pas besoin de mécanisme de persistence pour leur code.
@Water_Steve@PierrePoilievre So let’s go with that, allow the vehicles in the country with a recommendation not to have. Let the consumer decide what they want and the risk level they are comfortable with.
@Water_Steve@PierrePoilievre I hear you and agree to some degree but I don’t think we can compare with the ban on the company you named. The ban is on using them in the infrastructures, not end consumer products. Cars are end consumer products too.
Lower or remove taxes, and they will bring back the prices to the same point but pocket the difference. We saw it with fuel, as one of the many examples. That said, taxes should have never reached the level they are right now!
Carbon tax as an example. Most likely they thought a tax will hike the price so people will use less, thus reducing carbon footprint. Well.. we can’t get around using fuel!!! So it’s costing us more, not reducing usage!
Instead of all the constant negativity, what about leading and inspiring changes! Propose solutions to the government, bring alternative to things that don’t make sense. When comes campaign time, it’s then easier to demonstrate accomplishments instead of items you pointed at and did nothing.