BullCryptozor

Crypto is a dream, so dream...

[BullCryptozor @BullCryptozor]

Do you see this video?

A Bitcoin conference in 2010… completely empty.
No one there. Total silence.
Today? Everyone would have dreamed of being there.

https://t.co/Xp2BgQ1Upb

[laz1m0v @laz1m0v]

Precop is the infrastructure that will host the first algorithmic ICO natively on Bitcoin's Layer 1, meaning no human intervention or control from VC. The smart wallet is programmed to permanently block access once the absolute limit of 16,180,339 tokens is reached.

[Michael Saylor @saylor]

₿ack to Work

[Punkreturn @punkreturn_]

这次 ICO 推出的代币极其稀缺，每买一笔，价格就会自动上涨。你可以用 OPQT或OPQT或WTF 来购买，相比普通买家，你将获得巨大的购买力加成。你必须抢到优先席位，因为早期买家几乎能用白菜价抢到代币，而后来者只能眼睁睁看着价格暴涨，直冲月球。

[🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN•LOL @opreturnwars]

New ICO: price auto‑pumps on every buy.
Pay with BRC20 or Runes → get a fat multiplier.
Bitcoin? 1:1, no bonus.
Early = cheap. Late = moon.
Don't sleep.

[BullCryptozor @BullCryptozor]

@punkreturn_ @laz1m0v A new explosion is coming soon

[Punkreturn @punkreturn_]

ICO is the new trends on Bitcoin !
Follow the goat @laz1m0v
ICO is coming !

[Détectives Tokens @DetectiveToken]

Renseignez-vous sur la première ICO sur bitcoin, j'ai fais les premiers pré-requis pour pouvoir avoir le meilleur prix.

[laz1m0v @laz1m0v]

ICO launches a highly exclusive new token where the price increases automatically after every purchase. You will be able to pay with BRC20 or Runes assets . these grant you a significant multiplier on your purchasing power compared to regular buyers who use Bitcoin (which stays at a 1:1 rate). So early buyers snatch up the tokens for almost nothing before latecomers pump the price to the sky to the moon.

[BullCryptozor @BullCryptozor]

@punkreturn_ X1000 this year
X10000 for next altseason 😉

[🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN•LOL @opreturnwars]

@RoundtableSpace The capital rotation from overvalued, saturated company Actions into Bitcoin later this year will be absolutely biblical.
Now you know why!
Bitcoin is fun again for ICOs
Follow the wizard @laz1m0v

[BullCryptozor @BullCryptozor]

@adam3us

[BullCryptozor @BullCryptozor]

@punkreturn_ @Blockstream @adam3us @thecryptovalley Go to Ethereum ? Or solana ?
Sorry for bitcoin 🥲
@adam3us can you answer to that ?

[BullCryptozor @BullCryptozor]

@adam3us @prochronist
Blockstrem is a scam ?

That's pretty funy coming from an ecosystem that consistently refuses to engage on the technical side of Bitcoin development and instead prefers to call developers "scammers" whenever they propose a different architecture.

Nobody has been able to explain, from a technical perspective, why primitives like CSV, Simplicity, covenants, or client-side validation could not serve as the foundation for more advanced financial infrastructure on Bitcoin.

Instead, we always get the same anwser : "scam".

The most ironic part is that several people involved in these discussions openly acknowlege they do not fully understand all the topics being discussed, while still refusing to engage in the technical debate.

Cypherpunks debate architecture. Engineers respond with technical arguements. They don't replace protocol analysis with accusations.

If the architecture is bad, demonstrate it. Explain precisely why using CSV, Simplicity, covenants, or client-side validation is fundamentally flawd.

But reducing every discussion to "it's a scam" is not a technical argument. It's simply a way to avoid the converstation.

And honestly, that's dissapointing.

@laz1m0v @adam3us @punkreturn_ @prochronist

[BullCryptozor @BullCryptozor]

@prochronist Sorry for Bitcoin 🤐

[BullCryptozor @BullCryptozor]

What a beautifull response, really sets the example 😅

Sorry, but there is litteraly no scam here. Just a complete refusal to engage in technical debate.

Everytime architecture, primitives, Simplicity, CSV or L1 design gets brought up, the discussion instantly gets reduced to “scam” accusations instead of actual engineering arguments.

That’s exactly the problem being pointed out.

[BullCryptozor @BullCryptozor]

The problem is that every reply taken out of context completely miss the point.

This was never about “shilling an ICO” or forcing speculative token models onto Bitcoin. In fact, many of us are specifically trying to avoid repeating the same incentive failures we already saw elsewhere.

The real issue is that Blockstream became extremely hermetic toward external builders and alternative architectural discussions. Even worse, some people openly admit they don’t fully understand the systems being discussed, while still refusing any technical debate about it.

And unfortunately, this already happened before in Bitcoin history. This kind of mentality already pushed away major innovators in the past. Seeing the exact same patterns repeating again today, with almost no self reflection, is frustrating for developers who actually wants to build on Bitcoin instead of somewhere else.

Nobody is asking for blind validation. What some of us wants is a serious engineering discussion around what primitives like CSV, Simplicity, client-side validation, covenant designs, etc can realistically enable at the L1/L2 boundary.

That’s also why I would genuinely like to hear the opinion of @adam3us on the development and technology side specifically , not to force him to “pick a side”, but because he’s one of the very few people here who both understands the historical stakes and is still capable of engaging these discussions from a technical perspective.

Bitcoin deserves open architectural debate, not ideological gatekeeping.
@laz1m0v

[crlcrl7.base.eth @CRLCRL7]

Wanna (true) DeFi on L1 #Bitcoin ? You should follow @Universal_fdn instructions ! Make swap (@Wbtclol), buy some tokens (https://t.co/nrnjDo7nAu), put it in pool and let's enjoy the movement with ICO directly on $BTC #DeFi #ICO

[🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN•LOL @opreturnwars]

RULES FOR ICO is HERE !