gap that will not persist:
- quality of crypto tech and tools
- rarity of crypto integration
Most web development still doesn't include cash
wtf is the point
@LWIRED@__H0LL0W@SDude13446 In crypto, for the most part, it's safe to assume any given project does no engineering. Even in the top 30 this is true for most.
Not the case at ABC. Dev keeps accelerating through the poor price environment.
Assumption now: what we've built is impossible.
in crypto, so much money is going into re-engineering legacy finance with extra complexity
still value here because legacy finance has both competence and regulatory capture problems
weird spot where crypto tech overhead is "worth it" for unrelated benefits
Crypto payments have a billion-dollar problem: once you send @USDC, there's no refund. No chargeback. No buyer protection. That’s why most real-world businesses still won’t accept it.
@circle just solved it.
The Refund Protocol - on-chain escrow, three refund paths (including gasless EIP-712), and automatic debt recovery when the escrow is empty. Non-custodial. No intermediary can steal funds. Enforced entirely by the smart contract.
I wrote a full technical deep-dive on @Arc House breaking down every piece - architecture, payment lifecycle, dispute resolution, the debt system, and a builder integration guide.
Also created 5 animated explainer videos covering each concept visually.
This is post 3 in my Arc House series. Post 1 covered CCTP. Post 2 covered App Kit. This one covers the missing piece: what happens after someone pays.
Refunds are the last primitive on-chain payments were missing.
Full post here:
https://t.co/3KZV6bvmbB
@pitdesi crypto makes cash digital and eliminates third parties
this is the only justification for its technical overhead
costs nothing to hand someone $1 or send them an email
businesses that haven't figured this out are justifying their existence instead of solving the problem
@Truthcoin The BTC community is academic and introspective
In the 2017 blocksize wars, they "learned" this as good behavior
Almost a decade later the problems are more obvious, and the solution is ... competing visions of academic introspection
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The reason I think it will be figured out this year is because AI is finally good enough to sift through the enormous quantities of data required. And there's only a few hundred people it could possibly be.
Main takeaway from the Adam Back NYT fumble is that no one making these cases today was paying attention at any point from 2008-2015
New generation, new baseline
The culture tho has been quite static, especially for BTC
@vibhu Much crypto innovation in the last five years has been regulatory-driven competence arbitrage
Getting less friction by rebuilding what already exists with smaller teams, accepting crypto trade-offs without crypto benefits
Lots of "ghost" behavior even on dominant chains like $BTC
for example, nLocktime is basically never used
it could support enforced hold periods by freezing coins until a certain date ... enhancing the standard narrative use case
unfortunately nobody is actually using UTXO chains for interesting things, so older features, even powerful ones, are ignored for EVMs
narrative has evolved toward something like "using is bad"