@rpyers@paulmitche11@ASDem@KevinSabellico@KalshiPolitics I don’t know that it even needs to be that deep. If overall Democratic share of remaining ballots increases to 62% (from 58%) and Hilton’s share of GOP vote decreases to 64% (from 68%), then Steyer still needs to get a 56+% share of the entire Democratic vote to pass Hilton.
% of Republican voters with confidence that absentee/mail-in ballots were counted as voters intended
November 2020: 19%
November 2024: 72%
https://t.co/kHuTVYlEVM
Thank you, Speaker Robert Rivas, for lowering the bill limit in the State Assembly for the 2025-26 Session to 35 (down from the current 50)! Thank you, Pro Tem Mike McGuire, for lowering the bills limit in the State Senate for the 2025-26 Session to 35 (down from the current 40)!
The law now prohibits certification of results in California prior to the 28th day after the election so that voters have the opportunity to cure their signature mismatches. If California becomes a swing state any time soon we may need to revisit this one.
Fun fact: this issue is the basis on which the California legislature recently mandated that election results cannot be certified until December 3, 2024.
This was bound to happen…
Nevada’s Secretary of State says there’s a higher than normal of rejected mail-in ballots due to a signature matching issue.
He says one of the biggest issues is young voters whose signature does not match that on their driver’s license.
It’s mostly due to the fact that younger people don’t have a consistent signature.
Full Story: https://t.co/rbwS7Htcrw
The registrars have been overworked for many cycles, but this was a lot. So this year the legislature passed a law letting registrars determine specific processes, but slowing everything else down so those processes gave voters sufficient time to cure signature mismatches.
As disconcerting as it can be, it is a high privilege to live in a country where you don't know who is going to win an election tomorrow. Highly unusual in human history.
A friend sends a counterpoint to my puckish tweet about people who love election day:
I LOVE election day!
- Just 400 years ago (a tiny fraction of our 300,000 year history), if you were to tell everyone that every few years people vote for a new leader, and almost everyone votes, and the votes are tallied fairly, and mostly everyone accepts the results and the government changes hands peacefully - they would have thought you were NUTS.
- Also pretty incredible that at one point this was just an idea in the founder's heads ("what if everyone goes out to vote on the same day?") and now it happens...
- ...even as the US has become the most powerful country in the world (in history, most powerful countries become autocracies, right?)
- And it's SO COOL that no one can predict the results this time! We have two parties that appeal to two very different sensibilities. There's no tyranny of the majority, let alone a clear majority.
Election day is a MARVEL
Looks like this was NOT about the Prop D mailer, and is instead about payments made by the ballot measure committee which supported the mayoral campaign's efforts.
If this settlement has to do with the Prop D mailer, it - along with the recent Oakland Ethics Commission stipulations involving Libby Schaaf - are going to upend decades of normal understanding regarding candidate-control and permissible candidate activities.
The Colorado Secretary of State’s Office inadvertently posted a spreadsheet to its website with a hidden tab that included voting system passwords.
In a statement to 9NEWS, a spokesperson for the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office said that “the Department is working to remedy this situation where necessary.”
Full Story: https://t.co/8KRhYTOu1m
As someone who has for a decade tracked early voting, been a bit of a pioneer in providing data and analysis of early voting with @Political_Data, and featured in countless articles in print/tv/radio/podcasts on the early vote… I agree with @ForecasterEnten. 🧵