No, and I agree with what youโre saying, but letโs not forget that a major point of $STRC is to increase btc/share.
Iโm fine with selling $MSTR below 1 mNAV, because it usually means stack growth to expand and facilitate $STRC sales.
I will add: we should have smashed the ATM way more when mNAV was above 1.5-2.0
No, and I agree with what youโre saying, but letโs not forget that a major point of $STRC is to increase btc/share.
Iโm fine with selling $MSTR below 1 mNAV, because it usually means stack growth to expand and facilitate $STRC sales.
I will add: we should have smashed the ATM way more when mNAV was above 1.5-2.0
@BitStrategy21@StrategyMaxi But we want btc per share to increase YoY; and from what I see, saylor wants the same thing. Is there something Iโm not getting?
@AdamBLiv I donโt understand what is happening to him. He was crucial in my bitcoin journey. A sad thing to see, heโs almost taking the $MSTR stuff personally
@SimonDixonTwitt Weโre not a price manipulation engine, weโre a bitcoin accumulation engine. Iโm not sure who is believing your theory that 32 BTC moves the market
@SimonDixonTwitt Garbage post, absolute garbage.
You have good takes sometimes but a lot of times you think you know everything and so you try to fit each event into your own narrative without even double checking.
Heโs forced to sell these for tax purposes.
@araghchi โHad Lebanon been bargaining chip for Iran, we'd have a deal long ago.โ
This is a contradictory statement, youโre saying that you would have a deal long ago if it were not for us, which literally means we are a bargaining chip.