The BBC has issued an official explanation on why it has failed to cover our rape gang inquiry.
'Complex choices' are made for editorial and practical reasons.
These choices 'should not be taken as indicative of bias.'
Their words.
But the BBC were very quick to cover malicious complaints against our inquiry, in an attempt to smear our efforts? They were then forced to later apologise about how they covered the story.
So either the inquiry is worth reporting on, or it's not.
They can't pick and choose.
We're told 'complex choices' are made, meaning that efforts to uncover the industrial rape of young girls is not near the top of list.
Let's take a look at a few stories on the main BBC news page, right now...
'Osaka pays 'love and respect to Japan' in Wimbledon kimono'
'Why £15 durians are being sold at half price - or given away for free'
'We had packed lunches every day for 10 years and retired at 40'
Are these stories more important than the rape gang inquiry?
I think not.
You cannot hate the BBC enough.
I expect no fair coverage from them, I've stopped expecting it.
But the BBC is funded by the British people.
Their continued suppression of our inquiry is a disgrace.
@philipemmel@mikeerwydd1968 They claim to select an audience which aligns fairly closely with the general population at that time. I don’t think they align it with the makeup of the Commons.