Chris

United fan

[Kev 屮 @UtdKev08]

Casemiro breaking down into tears when giving his final message to Manchester United.

So beautiful yet heartbreaking. 🥺💔

[Chris @CJWReddevil]

@Mahmud_wazeeree No contest , Trevor every time

[Michael C @Michaeach3]

Japan's Imam Council is asking Japanese society for "calm and fair dialogue."

🔴 France listened - now it has no-go zones.
🔴 England listened - now it has grooming gangs and sharia courts operating in its cities.
🔴 Sweden listened - now it is the rape capital of Europe.

Japan is being asked to open its doors, and the moment a civic group tried to have an honest conversation, the Imam Council refused their mail and sent it back unopened.

Japan - you are watching Europe's future play out in real time.

Do not repeat its mistakes.

[The Touchline | 𝐓 @TouchlineX]

🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Harry Maguire was seen selling World Cup sticker albums at a Panini store in New York.

[Mia “GIRT” Lastname @themiasandrist]

Crying tears of pride right now

[Chris @CJWReddevil]

@NotFarLeftAtAll Cancer

[Clyde Shelton🎚️✝️👻 @Defcon0007]

For those of you thinking what will we do?

Use Tor instead (free & legal)

1. Download Tor Browser ONLY from https://t.co/BBI3QHHemC

2. Install & open → click Connect

3. Browse normally — your IP is hidden

4. .onion sites? Just paste any address ending in .onion
Blocked? Click Configure → Bridges → try Request bridge or Snowflake
Get bridges: https://t.co/JWDh3W3Uuw or email [email protected]
Slower than VPN but works when you need it. Always use HTTPS.

[Johannes M. Koenraadt @johannesmkx]

You can't ban VPNs because you can run one yourself on a rented server. Telegram CEO Durov explained in a speech he gave in Oslo that Russia hasn't been able to ban VPNs, and most people there can still access Telegram (which is banned in Russia) because new cheap VPNs keep popping up.

[Beautyon @Beautyon_]

No US VPN company will obey this.

"They’re turning privacy tools into surveillance gateways."

This is a threat only to the INGSOC and to no one else in the entire world.

Here are the top VPN companies and their associated jurisdictions:

NordVPN : Panama
ExpressVPN : British Virgin Islands
Surfshark : Netherlands
Proton VPN : Switzerland
Mullvad : Sweden
CyberGhost : Romania
Private Internet Access : United States
IPVanish : United States
Hotspot Shield : United States
TorGuard : United States
VPN Unlimited (KeepSolid) : United States
StrongVPN : United States
Windscribe : Canada
TunnelBear : Canada
PureVPN : British Virgin Islands
Astrill : Seychelles
FastestVPN : Cayman Islands
Ivacy : Singapore
Hide me : Malaysia
VyprVPN : Switzerland
Perfect Privacy : Switzerland
IVPN : Gibraltar
AirVPN : Italy
ZenMate : Germany
F-Secure Freedome : Finland

BVI is a British Overseas Territory has British sovereignty, but a separate legal jurisdiction. Not part of the UK, and not subject to UK surveillance/data law, so the VPN ban can't touch Express VPN.

This stupid, Luddite ban is therefore dead in the water, and all INGSOC can do is get OfCom to send threatening letters that will have no legal force, right Prezza @prestonjbyrne ?

[Victoria @VictoriqueM]

No, a "blanket VPN ban" in the UK is not happening, and the people shouting "ban incoming" don't understand what they'd actually be banning.A consumer VPN and a corporate VPN are the same protocols. WireGuard, IPsec, TLS tunnels.

There is no switch that blocks the teenager dodging age checks but spares Barclays' internal network, every company's link to AWS, every remote worker, every hospital trust.

Block VPNs at the network level and you nuke half the economy in the same swing. That's not me guessing. Peter Kyle already said a ban is "not on the cards" because VPNs are "essential to data protection for businesses."

The government conceded this in public. So no one's building a Great Firewall here.

What's actually proposed is regulatory, not technical: age-gate the providers, lean on Apple and Google to pull the apps.

What it does nothing to: a self-hosted WireGuard box on a €4 VPS. No app to pull, no website to delist, no company to fine.

Just one box among millions. Anyone technical routes around the entire thing in ten minutes, and the people it's aimed at are exactly the ones who'll do that.

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

As much as I hate to say this, I have to tell you the brutal truth: the system you think is protecting you was actually engineered from day one to trap you.

Article 19 of the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights is the exact global illusion that gets split into the UK’s domestic legal traps of Article 8 (Privacy) and Article 10 (Free Expression) under the Human Rights Act 1998 [HRA 1998].

Wake up and stop hiding behind the delusion of inalienable rights; the UN's UDHR is a toothless piece of 1948 diplomatic paper with zero legal force, manufactured by the exact globalist machine driving the 2030 Agenda. Even the ECHR and UK Human Rights Act were meticulously engineered from day one with structural escape hatches.

Your privacy and free speech are legally classified as "qualified rights," meaning they are hardcoded to be legally violated the second a politician decrees it "necessary and proportionate" [HRA 1998]. The human rights framework isn't your shield - it is the state's ultimate checklist to make your surveillance perfectly legal!

Because the UDHR failed to be legally binding, The Council of Europe created the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in 1950, which is enforceable in the UK through the Human Rights Act 1998. The public points to Article 8 (Right to Privacy/Correspondence) and Article 10 (Freedom of Expression) and thinks the state is blocked from spying on them.

The ECHR was never an absolute shield. It was designed from its very inception in 1950 to be mostly "qualified."

The Article 8 (Privacy): Paragraph 1 states you have the right to privacy in your correspondence. But Article 8(2) explicitly states the government can interfere with your privacy if it is "in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime..."

The Article 10 (Free Speech): Paragraph 1 gives you free expression. But Article 10(2) states this right carries "duties and responsibilities" and can be restricted for "the protection of health or morals, [or] the protection of the reputation or rights of others."

The HRA divides your rights into different categories, and the state has weaponised this division:

The Illusion: The public thinks all rights are absolute.

The Caveat: Only a tiny handful of rights (like Article 3: Prohibition of Torture) are absolute. The rights that protect your digital freedom; Article 8 (Privacy), Article 9 (Conscience), Article 10 (Free Expression), and Article 11 (Assembly) are Qualified Rights.

The Catch: Under the HRA framework, a qualified right is legally designed to be interfered with. The law explicitly states that the government can breach your privacy or restrict your speech as long as they can argue it is "lawful, necessary, and proportionate" to achieve a "legitimate aim" (such as "public safety" or "protecting health" or "protecting children").

Please, folks, we must use these caveated rights as tools while refusing to blindly believe they are a catch-all protection (did they help us during the lockdown or with mandates, NO!); the law will not save us, so we must wake up, organise, and fight back against this digital trap before the 2027 checkpoint closes forever!

[IT Guy @T3chFalcon]

Commercial VPNs route your traffic through shared IP addresses. thousands of users on the same IP. those IPs are public, known, and listed. The government can block them the same way Netflix blocks them, one IP list. done.

A self-hosted VPN is different.

Your server. your IP. nobody else's traffic on it. there is no list to add it to. the government would have to identify and block your specific home address or VPS individually. that is not scalable. that is not what mass VPN bans do.

here's how to build one in under 10 minutes.

you need:
— a $5/month VPS (DigitalOcean, Hetzner, Vultr — any will work)
— Docker installed
— 10 minutes

step 1: get a VPS. pick any provider. Ubuntu 22.04. the cheapest plan works.

step 2: install Docker on it.
curl -fsSL https://get[.]docker[.]com | sh

step 3: run WG-Easy. one command:
docker run -d \
--name wg-easy \
-e WG_HOST=YOUR_SERVER_IP \
-e PASSWORD=your_password \
-p 51820:51820/udp \
-p 51821:51821/tcp \
--cap-add=NET_ADMIN \
--cap-add=SYS_MODULE \
--sysctl="net.ipv4.ip_forward=1" \
--restart unless-stopped \
ghcr[.]io/wg-easy/wg-easy

step 4: open your browser. go to YOUR_SERVER_IP:51821. log in. click "new client." download the config. import it into the WireGuard app on your phone or laptop.

that's it. you now have a private VPN that:
— nobody else uses
— isn't on any blocklist
— costs $5 a month
— logs nothing unless you tell it to
— uses modern cryptography the NSA currently cannot break

WireGuard is built into the Linux kernel. 4,000 lines of code. fully audited. faster than OpenVPN. no configuration mistakes that accidentally weaken your encryption.

They cannot ban your server.

[WasAcop @WasAcop]

🚨VPNs to be forced to collect digital id data🚨

UK Labour government is pushing draconian digital control under the guise of “child safety.”

The House of Lords amendment now forces VPN providers to implement highly effective age assurance (ID checks, biometrics, etc.) to block under-18s from using consumer VPNs.

This comes right as they announce a full social media ban for under-16s — with further “VPN restrictions” due in July.

They’re turning privacy tools into surveillance gateways.

Digital ID-style verification creeping in everywhere.

This isn’t protection. It’s overreach.

Proof:
• Lords amendment text: https://t.co/qhZ0z3nKxR
• Lords vote & details: https://t.co/3Hv4zDaeob
• Liz Kendall on July VPN update + social media ban: https://t.co/4r67cC24JO
Wake up before it’s too late.

[Chris @CJWReddevil]

@IntCyberDigest Can't see it tbh . What you say @NordVPN UK ban ? Where do we go ?

[Chris @CJWReddevil]

@aquablvd Won't happen

[Spider-Man Movie @SpiderManMovie]

The world may have forgotten Peter Parker, but he hasn't forgotten them.

Watch the new trailer for #SpiderManBrandNewDay, in theatres July 31. Tickets on sale NOW.

[DiscussingFilm @DiscussingFilm]

The new trailer for ‘SPIDER-MAN: BRAND NEW DAY’ has been released.

In theaters on July 31.

[Chris @CJWReddevil]

@elonmusk Where are your papers 👀

[Asterix (FGTT) @NeelsBohr1204]

I don't care for soccer, so I haven't been watching. And then this slipped into my Tiktok feed. From Boston, Massachusetts.
This is the best anthem, without a doubt. No-one is going to convince me otherwise, ever.