The Democratic Party is blowing $20 million to win over young men. It’s called Speaking with American Men(SAM). Someone in the party thought this was a genius move, but it’s exactly why people are leaving the Democrat party in droves.
So after the Democrats called them toxic and ignored what they care about for years, they’re surprised young men reject their nonsense. My 3 Gen Z sons could tell them for free why they don’t connect with the Democrat Party. Democrat policies put Americans Last and lying, mocking and tried silencing them don’t win hearts. It’s not just bad messaging, it’s a values crisis no amount of money can fix.
@cbclark777@AnnieForTruth Did you already forget Biden and Burisma. Seems both sides of the aisle play similar games so let’s be fair about accusations shall wr?
Dear James "Civics 101" Tate,
How delightfully condescending of you to offer MAGA supporters a "quick civics lesson" while demonstrating you might need one yourself! Your oversimplified talking points sound like they came straight from a high school government textbook – which explains why they miss the nuanced reality of constitutional separation of powers.
Yes, courts can overturn unconstitutional laws – when they're actually interpreting the Constitution rather than substituting their policy preferences for those of elected officials. But here's where your "civics lesson" gets interesting: the Supreme Court just ruled in Trump v. J.G.G. that multiple federal judges were overstepping their authority by essentially trying to run immigration policy from the bench.
Your point about executive orders "not being laws" is technically correct but laughably incomplete. Executive orders absolutely have the force of law within the executive branch – that's literally how presidents execute their Article II powers. When a judge blocks a president from enforcing immigration law (you know, that thing the Constitution explicitly gives to the executive), that's not "checks and balances" – that's judicial usurpation.
Speaking of checks and balances, perhaps you missed that Congress just filed impeachment articles against multiple federal judges for precisely this kind of overreach? Judge Theodore Chuang, Judge James Boasberg, and Judge Jose Cano are all facing impeachment for stepping outside their constitutional role. Apparently, some judges need their own "civics lesson" about staying in their lane.
Here's a real civics lesson: when unelected judges with lifetime tenure start making policy decisions that belong to elected branches, that's not democracy – that's oligarchy with robes. The Founders designed judicial review to check unconstitutional actions, not to let judges become super-legislators.
Maybe between your condescending tweets, you could read some actual constitutional law instead of recycling freshman-level civics platitudes?
#JudicialOverreach #SeparationOfPowers #ConstitutionalLaw #TrumpVsJGG #RogueJudges #ArticleIIPowers #ChecksAndBalancesWork #ImpeachRogueJudges #ActualCivics #ReadTheConstitution
@RepSaraJacobs So Sara, are you working to solve the Mexican raw sewage flowing onto San Diego beaches or are you just happy to let the US be responsible for anything illegally coming across 5he border? Do you get warm feeling the comfort of all these people being counted in the 2030 census?
@RepDexterOR What Trump is doing is on behalf of the voters who put him in office. Let that sink in to your brain. We re UPSET at Biden’s open border. Very upset.
@CAgovernor@GavinNewsom You’ve had to take two emergency loans for $6.2 BILLION dollars already this year to keep Medical funded through June.
Republicans are trying to throw all the ILLEGALS you’ve been paying for off.
All Democrats do is LIE!