Hello. Today I took part in an online thought experiment discussing the law of self-defence. Just to be clear : none of these events happened. I have never been arrested and I have never lawfully or unlawfully killed anyone. Thank you.
@lewis_goodall If this is correct, it is hard to see (as a matter of charity law) how adopting a blanket objection policy would be consistent with its charitable status.
Starting today, Charity Bank will no longer be active on X (formerly known as Twitter).
We believe in a society where everyone respects each other. Unfortunately, recent changes at X make this difficult. There is too much disinformation and hate speech, and not enough moderation. Because of this, we have decided to stop using X.
We will keep our account to protect our name, but we won’t use it to share information or provide customer service.
Please follow us on LinkedIn or Facebook for updates. For questions about our products and services, visit our website: https://t.co/jl3kUrDfFN.
In a week's time, the duties on SUs under the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act kick in, as does the new complaints scheme - but OfS' response to the consultations on how those duties will work has still not been published. It's completely unreasonable and unacceptable to expect SUs to comply with duties that OfS has failed to answer questions on, clarify or resolve the ongoing questions on.
Interesting figures from the Charity Commission:
Charity applications reach record high (9k) amid “cost-of-living challenges and international instability”
New inquiries (89), whistleblowing reports (561) and serious incidents (3.1k) all up in 2023-24
@TomTugendhat It's a daft comment based on a Telegraph front page and which asks us to ignore the last Govt's record and irresponsibility. So, naturally, I assume that Tom Tugendhat is getting ready to announce his bid for Tory leader?
@Samfr If anything, the initial decision to do nothing, combined now with this belated decision to do something, just reinforces the notion that he is weak, indecisive and ethically out of sync. How he is this bad at politics?
@SpinningHugo Butler-Sloss v CC established that charity trustees have a considerably wider latitude in determining a suitable investment policy than previously thought. Key would be to link the divestment decision to the University's charitable purposes (rather than purely on moral grounds).
The charitable trust has already burned through all of the funding it was offered by the council to help see it through its first 10 years
https://t.co/BnCwLdLLD5
Great Ormond Street Hospital Children’s Charity has reported itself to two charity regulators after its subcontracted fundraisers were accused of using “pressure-selling techniques” https://t.co/BaRca2RHMk
@rcolvile It's an interesting argument. But you have to wonder: at what point does the chain of causation break down? When Benn stopped being Technology Minister in 1970? When Thatcher won in 1979? Or Blair in 1997? When he died in 2014? Ps. I know you didn't choose the headline.
Highly recommend Mr Bates v The Post Office which starts tonight. A brilliant and timely telling of how the worst miscarriage in British legal history came to happen.
https://t.co/AUkNW9ScZG
I am slightly flabbergasted that the migration debate has taken this rather appalling turn.
The truth is that foreign students subsidise U.K. higher education.
We should be grateful for the income that they bring. The research that they conduct . And that some wish to stay…