@nathancreitz@lukestamps Is reserving public office for those who acknowledge God's natural law a "pentalty" as stated in the BFM? It seems everyone is making a catoegory error/mischaracterization when huffing at mohlers statements.
@6mintheology@ConceptualJames According to Linsday, for daring to have an adult spiritual and intellectual conversation with some people more conservative than him (a low bar)
@WilliamWolfe I hope you're right. I was annoyed to see mohler balk/concede. Land's critique was very weak- "Who could adjudicate it? [Christian acknlowdgement] Uhh I don't know, maybe the same people who ajudicate our current agreed upon essential Christian morality (theft, murder, etc...)
@albertmohler@WNGdotorg degree than modern Baptists like Land. Israel, and any government did not & should not make laws that people "want". Sadly, most humans will hate most laws, though they are for their good. This is ok. It seems Land is letting the tail wag the dog and inverting biblical authority
@albertmohler@WNGdotorg As for separation of church and state, Baptists and society have "twisted" it badly, Land fails to recognize. In the OT, such separation only exist in terms of individual office holder, NOT in principle and/or morality. I think even early Baptists understood this to a better >>
@DineshDSouza Romans 9:19-20 LSB — You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?” On the contrary, who are you, O man, who answers back to God? WILL THE THING MOLDED SAY TO THE MOLDER, “WHY DID YOU MAKE ME LIKE THIS”?
@DefiantBaptist Dude @DefiantBaptist you are being a giant dweeb here, if not worse. Jon HAS addressed the circumstances in detail but it's obvious you were too excited to virture signal and did not first do the legwork. Very feminine behavior 👎
@gpclaw@CoryMMarsh2 Yes, I dont think cory (or anyone) is ever arguing that unrepentant/unregenerate people (jews or otherwise) are saved, let alone part of the specific covenant promises.
@WWUTTcom Very slimy to reference Hagee as a representative for dispensationalism or even baseline Christianity. He represents approximately 0.00001% of dispensational thought. While we're at it can we use Nick Fuentes to represent conservative Christians? See the problem?
@ThinkInContext@_jonbowlin Joshua doesn't describe land boundaries as stated in Genesis 15, just like 1948 boundaries don't, so I'm not convinced on this point.
@JayhawkTakeover@DreamBlue99781 "Buyers don't pay their agent" 🤡 Do you also think "free shipping" costs the buyer nothing? People's brains are cooked.
@ChristandGuitar No one, not jmac, and not even full dispys argue for pure literalism. Authorial intent is the term. Jesus is not a literal "door", for example. Next, it's only basic reason that a Roman Catholic eschatology which erases national Israel could/would have sprouted from antisemitism
@JoelWebbon Revelation 3:9 LSB — ‘Behold, I am giving up those of the synagogue of Satan, those who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie. Behold, I will make them come and bow down before your feet, and make them know that I have loved you.
@smashbaals Paying off credit cards and financed vehicles doesn't categorically fall under "providing for" families. Many people have massively foolish parents of course.