@Sai_Ishaya_@Sleek_Sloane Ironic because the only way AI 'solves' problems is through brute forcing, and being trained upon these lifetimes you say produced no utilitarian value.
>sam altman: "we tried this because there were rumor on the internet"
>rumor: math professor close to solving navier-stokes
>the professor: using codex for a year
>openai: has all his logs
>checked every codex session tagged to N-S
>found the most promising one
>spun up 10,000 agents to finish the proof where he couldn't
>they got caught
>told the guy if you say anything you'll destroy your own career
>he ruins his career over this
>openai: "we did not see his work"
>also openai: "we cannot rule out that de-identified data from their usage helped improve our models"
they stole it lmao
@Kressemedown@Footballera0 Hmm, I think its the exact opposite actually. I would agree that it is rare that people enjoy their jobs (unfortunately), but, it should be your purpose. Personally, my goal in life is to achieve/progress humanity through means I find interesting, hopefully through my job.
@BananaFudgeBars@BrewHou51375192@lupoxbt Yes I am aware. There is nothing shocking here that is novel, just the result of more compute and probably highest weight model, and like you said reducing cost and improving speed. And yes, other models are 'universal' in the sense that they can do pretty much all of this.
@somesortofrealm@Footballera0 Work, generally, is purpose. We will never live in a world like this, where people do nothing but engage in hedonism all day. What we work on will change though, likely for the benefit of all. This new model isn't nearly as impressive as people thing it is.
@Kressemedown@Footballera0 This is a bit extreme. Work is partly what makes life interesting. If you hate your job, sure, that can be hard to believe. But doing 'nothing' is not Eden. We will progress to different work though, and likely be better off for it.
@Footballera0@BrockLeeRob1 We are far from terminator, I feel like you should avoid fearmongering. AI will takes jobs, sure, but there's an argument to be made that as time goes on these things SHOULD change. We didn't use excel 100 years ago, and we will likely be doing something different in the next 100
@Footballera0 This is not nearly as impressive as the world is making it seem.
AI assistant scheduling was first demoed a decade ago, AI making games isn't impressive, and they have always had PPTX/design skills. This only feels impressive because its voice controlled.
@BrewHou51375192@lupoxbt exactly what I thought yea, none of this is really new its just pushed as being voiced powered.
AI making games isnt new either, and they suck at making anything more than basic atari style ones.
.@SBETeam take the series 2-0 over Without a Roof getting revenge for the upper bracket!
After the win, tempers flared as @_shanecs had some choice words for @Stewie: