@mikasawaifu @EFT_Seattle @LaikaAndYuri @Justice4GPM Actually, your curvature formula is wrong, the math you did was for a slope, not a curve. You DO need the miles^2 part for it to be a curve.
The more I research the more I can't see how a globe is possible. 2 years ago I would have laughed at myself and called me crazy. #smh#flatearth#geocentism#fe
@BenevolentPixie @ChadMegumin @EFT_Seattle @LaikaAndYuri @Justice4GPM You are 100% wrong. "We" didn't come up with the math, it's just THE math. If you don't square it you end up with a sloped line not a curve. You need the ^2 at the end.
@ChadMegumin @BenevolentPixie@EFT_Seattle @LaikaAndYuri @Justice4GPM You are 100% wrong. We don't live in a slope. It's squared. And "we" didn't invent this math. It's just THE math
@TheFlatEartherr@Keithpoker1 Brother, I'm a flat earther & a professional photographer & videographer & these are definitely out of focus. We need to be careful what we spread as truth, and not just jump on what we WANT to be true. I'm not saying NASA CGI is true, I'm just saying that there are out of focus.
@USMCNoggin @Beeeelzebub888 Seriously? You're a Marine right? Get off your ass and do some research. Find your own earth curvature test or start with the 38 videos I've shared with you. Stop waisting time with words without knowledge. Research. Still waiting for you to talk with your Navy friends.
@Beeeelzebub888 I'd like your opinion on gyroscopes. Everything I can find (even Air Force training videos) say that outside
Gyroscopes operate independent of gravity. That they work off the laws of angle momentum?
@NJThomo And I'm going to assume that by your additive of "University" you meant that in a derogatory way, implying that YouTube can't be authoritative? That's a Straw Man attack and even an ad hominem fallacy against YouTube.
@NJThomo YouTube is one of many places I have for information. You have to be careful though, as with any source material, you need to vet it, there is lots of crap out there.
Books, research papers, testimonies, interviews, my own personal tests/experiences, etc
@Corax_The_Raven @LaikaAndYuri Personally I have not, but others have. Here's a testimony from a carrier airborne navigator: https://t.co/NualBteqAs
Here's a testimony from a career land surveyor: https://t.co/BHJB9Mb9Lc
Army air traffic controller on RADAR: https://t.co/XUuoWvd8Ss
@MarakoTimmy @LaikaAndYuri All of these topics have been talked about at length by people out there, and there are some great responses and follow ups to those points. I encourage you to do some research on those very topics and see what you can find. I'm not your researcher. You are :)
@USMCNoggin @Beeeelzebub888 Yeah, you showed me some drawings and words on paper, I've shown you almost 40 videos of people showing those words aren't exactly accurate. What's the saying? Pictures or it didn't happen?
@USMCNoggin @Beeeelzebub888 Here... To move past your last excuse for why you won't listening to the testimony of an active, verifiable, Navy missile instructor/trainer ... Here is a non-sargant, non-monetized video of 30+ line of site tests. https://t.co/rAWjLMCUWW
I would honestly like your opinion.
@USMCNoggin @Beeeelzebub888 I mean that's great for you that a manual says one thing... but there are MANY people showing the opposite. Not conjecture, they are actually doing line of sight tests and showing what's possible. You will either shake your head and go, NOPE, or you will be open minded and look.