Alex F

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech I’d love to talk to you about better ways to structure the game. Or i can just post it all here

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech Bro can you DM me please

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech On another post, sorry driving

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech I broke it down with on another port of yours

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech That’s the one because it turns your holders into your distribution instead of asking them to pay a toll. Nobody loses anything, so it can ship without upsetting anyone already on the map.

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech 11/
Two things I’d want to know:

How many of the 114 are actually active vs claimed and gone quiet?

And with 83 slots left, claiming has an expiry date. What’s the funnel when the map fills?

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech 10/
And cut five doctrines to three.

Five where one does nothing is really four. Four is still a lot for a vote most people skim.

War becomes People vs People, Money breaks ties. Drop the fraction.

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech 9/
Put every doctrine on the same axis: spend People to get Money, or Money to get People.

Right now Industry costs loyalty, Open Borders costs war strength, Conscription costs economy. Three different units, so nobody can compare them.

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech 8/
Cut it to two numbers: People and Money.

Drop loyalty as its own stat. A citizen who also holds the hub just counts as two people.

Same information, one less rule, and hub demand becomes structural instead of cosmetic.

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech 7/
On the economies.

A nation currently has 3 stats, 5 doctrines that each cost a different currency, a 2/3–1/3 war formula, and annexation.

That’s more than most people will read before they bounce.

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech 6/
Sinks that don’t punish anyone already here:

– Loyalty multiplies war strength + rank
– Wars stake hub both sides, loser’s burns
– Doctrines cost hub, burned
– Districts and remaining claims require it

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech 5/
How you roll it out matters.

Don’t retrofit a toll onto the 114 who already claimed without holding any. Taxing people retroactively is how you lose presidents.

Make it an advantage you can buy, not a fee you owe.

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech 4/
The fix: make the hub the thing nations need in order to win.

If loyalty multiplies war strength and rank, every president has a standing reason to drive their own citizens into it.

That’s 114 people marketing it against each other. You can’t buy that.

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech 3/
Meanwhile every country coin has an obvious reason to exist. It IS the nation.

So the hub is competing against 114 live tokens that all have more utility than it does.

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech 2/
NBHOOD is counted but never required.

World population reads its holder count. Loyalty measures who holds it. That’s it.

A president can claim, govern, pass doctrines and fight a war without ever touching it.

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech 2/
NBHOOD is counted but never required.

World population reads its holder count. Loyalty measures who holds it. That’s it.

A president can claim, govern, pass doctrines and fight a war without ever touching it.

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@NBHOODStech 1/
Been through NEIGHBOURHOODS properly. 114/197 claimed is a real game, so this is built on top of what’s working, not a rethink.

Two things: the hub token has no job, and the country economies are heavier than they need to be.

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@elliotrades @elliotrades Reggie educated us about owning the land! @ReggieMiddleton

[Alex F @CallMeVeritas]

@ReggieMiddleton Now this is utility.
Cheers RM, check out 0x0..
@0x0exchange