So I went on Nairaland.
I searched “Tinubu”. I also searched “Obi”.
Since they were both governors. I wanted to see Media footprint of who they were and what they represented Pre-2022.
Here is a screenshot. First 2 is for Tinubu. Last 2 is for Peter Obi.
Jan 26/2027. You’ll have to choose 1 of these 2 to lead Nigeria.
Who are you choosing?!
Debunking the Phantom Debts and Ecological Loan Fallacy
My attention has been drawn to trending claims by the Anambra State Government that my administration left behind inherited debts, including a ₦2 billion ecological loan, contractor liabilities, and unpaid salaries, gratuities, and pensions. This is completely false.
We systematically liquidated historical gratuities and arrears dating back several years, amounting to over ₦35 billion. At the point of handover, the state owed nothing in salaries, gratuities, or pensions, nor did we owe anything to any contractor for projects duly executed and certified.
The ₦2 billion ecological fund in question was released barely three months before the end of my tenure for the Oko/Umuchiana erosion crisis. Despite pressure to spend the money, I refused, insisting that it should be left for my successor because government is a continuum and the funds were tied to a specific project.
The money was therefore left 100 per cent intact in First Bank, in Account No. 2018779464, with a balance of over ₦2.13 billion.
It is important to stress that funds tied to specific projects or set aside for particular purposes were not even included in the over ₦75 billion in savings we left behind.
If anybody can establish anything to the contrary, I will stop campaigning. -PO
What an incredible session! 💛
A huge thank you to our amazing speakers, @Pejuola_a, @bsong_HR, and @Qu_Estique, for generously sharing your knowledge, experiences, and practical advice. Your insights will undoubtedly shape many HR careers.
If men truly h8ted intelligent women, female doctors, lawyers and professors wouldn’t be getting married daily.
The real issue is that many women confuse arrogance and combative behavior with intelligence.
If you marry a man within your financial bracket or lesser, you’ll disrespect him. But you want a man who earns significantly higher to respect you.
The math is ridiculous.
If you were all that, you wouldn’t have to be looking for a NEW rich bloke every other month
What happened to the previous ones you met ?
Maybe your Pum isn’t as fire and lucrative as you thought it was ? Maybe you’re only good for ‘one offs’ ?
Aii you’ve been “avoiding broke Men” for years, all the ‘rich dudes’ you’ve been getting with, why aren’t you rich yet babes ?
Do y’all think about all of these ?
This is what a non-transactional relationship looks like.
1. You go on dates, the man pays for it.
2. She visits him, she pays for her transport.
3. On their special dates, they gift each other whatever they can afford without comparing or competing with each other.
4. She pays for her hair, airtime, rent, etc, and he does the same.
5. If they're cohabiting, she brings and he brings, but he pays for the rent. And the bringing doesn't have to be equal.
6. If they're serious, she continues to look for ways to invest in him, while he continues to look for ways to invest in the future of both of them.
7. If she's in genuine financial needs, he can offer to help as much as possible if he can.
8. Once in a while, he can decide to give her money randomly. Especially when she does something he's proud of.
9. He's not responsible for her siblings or parents' financial needs or wants.
10. Sex is never weaponised or commercialised. It happens because both of are adults and you enjoy pleasing each other sexually.
11. You genuinely care for each other, and would still continue to care for each other, even when sex has not been involved for a while.
12. If the woman "loans" him money, he has to pay back. And if he "loans" her money, she doesn't necessarily have to pay back or pay all.
End.
Feminist disguised as a man and thought she would experience toxic masculinity but instead she experienced male bonding and found out how women are toxic towards men.
Pastor Paul Enenche is 58 years old, & has been married for 31 years.
I have been married for a little over half of that.
But we are saying the same things when it comes to a man being the provider.
And we are both providers to our respective families.
Telling you that, if your wife earns N1m, and you earn N100k, and that you should give her N50k from it, is wisdom that many of you have failed to see the depth of its meaning & importance.
Is it 50k that would truly feed the wife, kids and handle the expenses?
The answer is no.
What he's saying is that you as the man should not feel entitled to your wife's money.
And that just because she's making way more than you're making, then you should relax and say she should take over from you as the provider.
He mentioned that giving your wife half of what you earn, despite her earning more, shows that you care.
And it shows that if you have more, you'd give.
Your wife will respect you better than the wife of a man who feels entitled to her money.
He's speaking wisdom.
You're the one that doesn't want to think, neither do you really have a full grasp of his message, even if you're a married man.
Lastly, there would surely be some imbalance or friction in a marriage where the wife earns more.
But a wise husband that is not greedy, will retain his position as the head of his home, for a much longer time, while he works harder to bridge the gap.
Not feel relaxed because his wife is always stepping into his roles and responsibilities for him.
End.