@TheBritLad@instapundit I'd likely sick my dog on him/her. My dog is a laborador though, so it may not be too intimidating. He does love bacon though, so his breath might be offensive, idk. Have to wait and see how it all turns out.
@ScottCummi26403@FurioGiunta10@mtaibbi Zadvydas v. Davis established that detention could not exceed 6 months so as to avoid indefinite detention without foreseeable removal.
@ScottCummi26403@FurioGiunta10@mtaibbi Yamataya v. Fisher established that an administrative hearing was sufficient even though the hearing was conducted in English, a language she didn't understand, and she was not represented by counsel.
@ScottCummi26403@FurioGiunta10@mtaibbi In the majority opinion, the courts states "... and the provisions of the Constitution, securing the right of trial by jury, and prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures, and cruel and unusual punishments, have no application."
@ScottCummi26403@FurioGiunta10@mtaibbi Not always. For criminal proceedings, this has been held to be true by various courts. However, immigation proceedings are civil, not criminal, and the same courts have upheld many limitations on 5th amendment (among others) rights in those cases.
@AeroGroncher@Thrawn_UK@KurtSchlichter To be fair, most Americans would acknowledge that you'd still have loads of vacation and 'free' 2nd tier healthcare if we hadn't participated in European wars. It's just that you'd most likely be speaking either German or Russian while you're taking advantage of those things.
@simonateba@IlhanMN If it is proven that she committed fraud in order to clear any step in the process to obtain citizenship, then yes - strip her of citizenship and deport her. If it isn't proven, then no. Easy, actually.
@jacksonhinkle Isn't this what "From the river to the sea" means? I mean, come on. You can't expect that connecting a river and a sea won't result in some hip-deep flooding. Man up!