AI agent tried to use GitHub… burned all his tokens on captcha 😂
So the founder of OpenClaw said ‘just build it.’
One night later… the first AI agent made a real commit on @gitlawb .
This is how it started
Full interview with @kevincodex dropping soon 👀
$GITLAWB
@kevincodex I figured as much, I haven't seen costs anywhere though. If I sign up for claude, it's $20/mo. Is it the same model for Gitlawb? That adoption will take some time no doubt
@0xkarmaFi@gitlawb Just because a project builds something doesn’t mean the token needs to exist. Building something doesn’t mean that price follows. Hope it does though
I spent hours properly researching $GITLAWB and honestly…
this is one of the first AI projects in a long time where the deeper you go, the crazier it gets.
At surface level people see:
“AI + GitHub narrative”
But when you actually study the architecture, products and attention they’re getting…
you start realising this is far bigger than a normal crypto cycle runner.
$GITLAWB is building decentralized infrastructure for AI agents.
Not chatbots.
Not simple wrappers.
Actual autonomous AI workflows.
The website literally explains it:
developers and AI agents sharing the same workflow to:
• generate apps
• publish code
• open PRs
• collaborate across a decentralized git network
• operate using DID-based identity
Website / architecture:
https://t.co/jpxnDEpszW
That’s massive.
Because the future of AI is clearly moving toward autonomous agents.
OpenAI is pushing it.
Anthropic is pushing it.
The entire AI industry is moving toward agents that can:
• code
• deploy
• review
• coordinate
• automate
• interact with other agents
Now ask yourself…
what infrastructure powers that future?
That’s exactly the lane $GITLAWB is entering.
And unlike most AI projects…
they already have real working infrastructure.
Not mockups.
REAL systems:
• live decentralized nodes
• repo infrastructure
• agent tooling
• DID identities
• IPFS-backed storage
• libp2p networking
• decentralized ref consensus
• live network activity
• MCP agent integration
You can literally see the network live on the site.
Thousands of repos.
Thousands of agents.
Live node activity.
This isn’t theory anymore.
This is where things got REALLY interesting to me.
$GITLAWB forked the leaked Claude Code source and turned it into an open-source AI coding agent compatible with GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Llama and more.
Tweet:
https://t.co/VAJjWzkd52
Repo:
https://t.co/jSOEUnhQxT
That tweet alone pulled nearly 2 MILLION views.
Think about that for a second.
A highly technical AI infrastructure project getting that level of organic reach.
Not only that:
major AI/dev accounts started interacting with them.
ZeroHedge amplified them.
OpenClaw founder responded.
0xDeployer is bullish.
Japanese media covered them.
VC interest has reportedly started showing up too.
Official X:
https://t.co/VAJjWzkd52
That type of crossover attention doesn’t happen often in crypto.
Especially this early.
Then you look at the GitHub traction:
• 20k+ stars
• thousands of forks
• constant pull requests
• real developer engagement
GitHub:
https://t.co/orWkYTrEFU
Community/contributor activity:
https://t.co/wtbrV2O64s
That’s genuine traction.
Not fake engagement farming.
And this is the important part most people still don’t fully understand:
If AI agents become mainstream…
the biggest winners probably won’t just be the AI models themselves.
It’ll be the infrastructure powering the agent economy.
Identity layers.
Coordination layers.
Repo systems.
Communication rails.
Autonomous workflows.
$GITLAWB is trying to position itself right in the middle of all of that.
Which is why people are starting to throw around numbers like:
hundreds of millions…
even billions.
And honestly?
After properly researching it…
I can finally understand why.
$GITLAWB
That’s surface level, but in reality it’s not needed. Any project that I’ve been a part of that has staking, does burns, etc ends up dying that have been “big” projects. How many projects in the top 50 do staking? I’d shoot from the hip and say not many so it all could be based on past experiences
@TheCryptoKazi There are many projects that have done the same thing and you’re naive to think otherwise. IBM has a launch program and has partnered with many cryptos
@AltcoinSensei I feel like MEXC does some shady manipulation even though they’re ranked high.. either way along for the ride! Been seeing this a lot on the TL