@scotparent1012 It is the same community. The issue for LGB Alliance is not protecting children; it is just a petty ideological issue. Best remove them as 'allies' from all parental efforts to protect our children from LGBTQ+ indoctrination.
@SVPhillimore Perhaps it is time equality looked at the hiring practices of the LGBTQ+ organisations that ALL receive public funding. How many non-LGBTQ+ people are employees? Perhaps, more balanced and equal hiring practices might result in some sanity.
@scotparent1012 Calling someone a bigot is not a homophobic attack. Protesting against LGB people meeting is not homophobic particularly as the people protesting are part of the same 'LGB'TQ+ community.
@wundt_vil Salmond and Grossart destroyed Scotland's banking sector. Grossart made a fortune from the dodgy deal between ABN AMRO and RBS. A blog on the Grossart divorce proceedings shines a very odd light. The details of the divorce case should be of public record. https://t.co/V7wESoHZHu
@scotparent1012 It is not homophobia; it is the usual self-indulgent nonsense coming from both LGB Alliance and their buddies in all the other LGBTQ+ orgs. The only difference being the T. Not one of these orgs is about protecting children - they are all the opposite as proven over decades.
@TwisterFilm ...and David Jackson. He claimed to be a volunteer for LGBTYS when caught trying to meet a 12 year old boy for sex. He ran a LGBT Youth org in Fife. He was also PIE member John Hein's Fife correspondent in Scotsgay. And wrote for LGBT H&W in a doc for Gov on LGBT needs in Fife.
@LongfordBandito@EwenDCameron We no longer play football - instead football is taught to children. All the joy and creativity has been left along with the jackets for goalposts.
@Glinner Pranking by a Novice of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence most likely - hence the Psalm reference at the end. In Scotland they were founded by the guys behind the Paedophile Information Exchange.
@Annemarieward@MartynMcL@nmcintosh@somerspsych Legal difficulty arises when SCR 'carers' require immunity from prosecution for facilitating Class A drug use. It creates a very dangerous grey area.
@RussellFindlay1 @olivermundell Not a good look again Russell. Just because someone backs you does not require you to blemish your name with their prior disasters.