@neeratanden@Saqib_hmed@daveweigel By this logic, surely being a GOP activist would be sufficient to consider her allegations non-credible, right? You guys aren’t seeing the hypocrisy here?
@DJCrabhat@AbiShuuwi@facetedcarapace Was I making the claim, or was I explaining *his* relatively standard usage of the term? Again, reading would do you well.
@peptide@facetedcarapace The way he used it is fine, if something can get arbitrarily large or arbitrarily close to something, it means its closeness or largeness is unbounded.
@flashgo21@razibkhan Yeah, my point is that kvetching about the healthcare consequences of a 95th percentile score vs a 99th percentile score is probably unjustified. If the question is about ethics (who “deserves” to get in) that is a separate matter.
@mean_field_zane I mean I think there is a distinction to be made between “problem-solving” (something that we generally try to associate with high IQ) and broader conceptual intuition. It seems like the advantage of “superior problem-solving” is on its way to disappearing.
@T88621@razibkhan If you believe reading a passage that spells out the answer to anyone with a content background constitutes “reasoning skills” you are telling on yourself.
@T88621@razibkhan I have taken it and scored very highly on it lmao. The verbal reasoning is utterly trivial outside of CARS. You can get a 132 on C/P, B/B, and P/S solely with a sufficiently robust content base.