“I’m proud of what we’ve accomplished — lowering costs, protecting our communities, and standing up to Trump.”
You have done quite literally none of these….
New York is more expensive today than when Cuomo was ousted.
It’s more unsafe, criminals are out on the street within hours of an arrest, our law enforcement is disenfranchised due to that fact and many have the “why bother” mentality now.
You haven’t done s**t to Trump other than levy some “Trumped” up charges to “get him”….
You’re a joke, worse than any other Governor by a long shot. And now you have to buddy up to the communist mayor just to try and garner enough adjacent votes to maybe squeeze out re election…
Which if that happens and you are re elected you will be primary’d the very next election by that communist mayor and the state will flip Red.
Either way you’re done.
Vote @NassauExec
We can’t afford more Kathy
Roland G. Fryer jest rzadkim przykładem czarnego profesora topowego uniwerku, który dostał się na uczelnię nie za kolor skóry, ale za pracę naukową. Nie był oszustem, nie był plagiatorem, nie był obłąkanym mitomanem. Jego problem polegał na tym, że zrobił badania i uzyskał wyniki, które nie spodobały się władzom na uniwersytecie ani lewicowym aktywistom kontrolującym kampus. Mówimy tutaj o Uniwersytecie Harvarda.
"Jeden z kolegów wziął mnie na stronę i powiedział, żebym tego nie publikował, bo zrujnuję swoją karierę. Nie posłuchałem go i opublikowałem, i potem przez miesiąc pod moim domem stała policja, a na zakupy chodziłem z uzbrojoną ochroną. Kupowałem pieluchy dla dziecka w towarzystwie ochroniarza z bronią."
Groźby śmierci wysyłane przez lewicowych fanatyków to jedno. Drugą kwestią jest reakcja władz uczelni. Krótko po publikacji artykułu pojawiły się zarzuty, że Fryer flirtuje z pracownicami w swoim laboratorium EdLabs. Wytknięto mu "niepożądane zachowania o charakterze seksualnym" (głównie werbalne, w tym żarty). Harvard zawiesiła go na dwa lata bez wynagrodzenia, zamknął laboratorium i nałożył ograniczenia. Fryer przeprosił za nieodpowiednie żarty, zaprzeczył jednak zarzutom o molestowanie.
Nie napisałem jeszcze, co takiego odkrył Fryer, że rozwścieczył lewicowych cerberów politycznej poprawności. Otóż odkrył, że amerykańska policja wcale nie strzela i nie zabija czarnych częściej niż białych i że użycie broni przez policje warunkowane jest zachowaniem podejrzanego.
Tak, dobrze przeczytaliście. Tyle wystarczy, aby na Harvardzie chcieli cię zabić.
Funny how all the so called military experts today have forgotten how difficult the war against the PaliNazis was... In the days following October 7, the most authoritative military experts in America, including David Petraeus, had this to say about the extreme difficulties facing Israel:
" As a military commander, that means not just a lot of as-precise-as-possible airstrikes, but at some point, you have to go in on the ground, clear every building, every floor, every room, every basement, every tunnel — part of a very extensive tunnel system — against terrorists who know this place better than the backs of their hands, have demonstrated significant tactical creativity, and have shown a willingness to blow themselves up to take Israeli soldiers with them.
And by the way, you not only have to clear every building like that, but you also must then retain each building by leaving a substantial force behind, one that’s large enough that it can’t be swarmed by the enemy who can then add captured soldiers as hostages to the over 200 hostages that have already been taken. And, of course, this will all be done in a densely populated area with substantial numbers of civilians — even with hundreds of thousands of people — leaving Gaza City and northern Gaza.
******Andrew and I have gone back through all these conflicts that we recount from 1945 until now, and we can’t envision a more challenging context for a military commander and soldiers than this one.*********
Some of the other obstacles that the Israelis will likely encounter in Gaza: Hostages, human shields, suicide bombers, improvised explosive devices, booby traps, snipers and fighters not in uniform. And Hamas has had years to prepare.
PETRAEUS: Also, a lot of civilians, in addition to hostages. It’s hard to imagine anything more challenging than this, and that’s especially true if there is a push to do this rapidly.
Exactly right. And by the way, Mosul’s population wasn’t two million at that time. Hundreds of thousands of civilians had left. It was certainly roughly the same size of Gaza, but not with the same number of high-rises that you find in Gaza.
It’s also worth pointing out, of course, that you’ve got to do all of this in a situation where you don’t know what Iran will do next. You don’t know what Hezbollah in southern Lebanon is going to do next. The West Bank front could open up at any moment. A large number of Israeli reservists, 360,000, has been called up but if you’re suddenly fighting on multiple fronts, that force gets dissipated."
Israel's responses to Hamas's /Iran/Hezbollah/Houthi invasion/attack will go down in history as the most meticulously and carefully planned and effectuated military operations ever with the lowest civilian to combatant casualty ratio in the history of urban warfare.
https://t.co/Y1JAV5anZL
@grok@MaxNordau@TullamoreJew_ During most of the first half of the XXth century, the term “palestinian” was interchangeable with “Jews living in Palestine”.
Arabs living in Palestine were…. Arabs.
@grok@MaxNordau@TullamoreJew_ Those figures seems unreal, since records speak of around 600k “palestinians” living West of the Jordan by 1948. No growth in 30 years, despite accounts of large Arab migrations due to job creation by Jewish entrepreneurs?
@CaesarHADRIANVS@RepSusieLee Not really.
He might have criticized the practices, but not Judaism.
Hadrian, on the other hand, was very fond of Greek deities.
@grok@MaxNordau@TullamoreJew_ It differs from your previous replies.
Most of the area West if the Jordan was uninhabited, swamps, etc.
You make it sound like people living in France who speak Arabic could claim part of France and identify themselves as Gaulles, with no real ties to France other than cousins
@grok@MaxNordau@TullamoreJew_ You are contradicting yourself claiming its population had “Palestinian origins” since you already stated the only common trait of “Arabs of Palestine”had was the Arabic language, not ethnic roots.
Hence, Arabic speaking residents of the Mandate can’t be considered a “people”.
@grok@MaxNordau@TullamoreJew_ So, the problem is not about a “Palestinian people” not having a State, which they do (Jordan). Hence, a 2-state solution already exists.
It’s about the Arabs not accepting Jewish statehood in the recognized Jewish National home in Jewish ancestral land, a mere 21% of the Mandate
@grok@MaxNordau@TullamoreJew_ So, Arabs of Palestine, later called “Palestinian people” (after 1964) already have a state, called Jordan.
The Jewish National home, West of the Jordan river, was repeatedly attacked, not because of lack of Statehood for the Arabs, just to deny the Jewish people their rights.
@grok@MaxNordau@TullamoreJew_ So, in brief:
- the early calls (1908) for Arab statehood was based on a common language, not ethnicity.
- a state for the Arabs of Palestine was created occupying 78% of the British Mandate.
- During Jordan’s occupation, no Palestine was pursued until 1964.
- Jordan is Palestine
@grok@MaxNordau@TullamoreJew_ So, an independent Arab State, for the Arab Speaking residents of the Palestine mandate was carved out of it, comprising 4/5 of the Mandate. And yet nobody claimed it was for the “Palestinian people”.
It seems like Jordan is the State the Arabs of Palestine were claiming to have