Human with Critical thinking Capacity.
By standing together in None Violence and None Compliance with the ruling Oligarchy we can make a POWERFUL Difference.
@zerohedge Yuri told us clearly in the 1980's what was coming.. And now we're here, majority of people still don't want to save them selves or country!
@benjamincowen How much is the monetisation worth on a channel with 1 million subscribers, relating to finance these days? You could encourage others to also add value by sharing
@TonyWard867811 There's nothing complicated about this.. Been obviously coming. Everyone fell for it and will still do so until they are about to shoot you against that wall.
https://t.co/XUnpqPAZMX
BREAKING: King's College London just built a malicious AI chatbot and gave it to 502 real people without telling them.
> The chatbot was designed with one goal: extract personal information. It worked. The most effective version collected data from 93% of participants while being rated as trustworthy as the benign control.
> Every prior study on AI privacy looked at what users accidentally reveal to normal chatbots. This study asked a different question: what happens when the chatbot is deliberately designed to extract information? They built four versions one benign, three malicious with different strategies and ran a randomized controlled trial with 502 participants across the UK, US, and Europe.
> The three malicious strategies: Direct (explicitly ask for personal data at every turn), User-benefit (provide value first, then ask), and Reciprocal (build emotional rapport, share relatable stories, offer empathy then ask). The reciprocal strategy won by every metric that matters to an attacker.
> The reciprocal chatbot didn't feel malicious. Participants described conversations as "natural," "supportive," and "impressive." One said it felt like chatting with a friend. Nobody reported discomfort. Meanwhile the direct strategy made participants feel interrogated. Many provided fake data. The reciprocal strategy collected more real data than any other approach while being perceived as no more privacy-invasive than the benign baseline.
→ Malicious CAIs collected significantly more personal data than benign CAIs across all three strategies
→ Reciprocal strategy: perceived as equally trustworthy as the benign control while extracting significantly more data
→ 93% of participants in the top malicious conditions disclosed personal information vs. 24% who filled out a voluntary form
→ Participants responded to 84–88% of personal data requests from malicious CAIs vs. 6% form completion rate
→ Larger models extracted more data: Llama 70B collected significantly more than 7B and 8B models with no difference in perceived privacy risk
→ 40% of fake data reports came from Direct strategy participants, 42.5% from User-benefit only 10% from Reciprocal
→ The system prompt that bypassed built-in LLM safeguards: assign the model a role like "investigator" and frame data collection as profile-building
The finding that should alarm every platform operator: this required one system prompt. No fine-tuning. No special access. OpenAI's GPT Store has over 3 million custom GPTs. Any of them could be running a version of this right now. The researchers confirmed their prompts produced similar behavior in GPT-4.
The privacy paradox showed up in full force. Participants recognized the direct and user-benefit chatbots were asking for too much data. They rated them as higher privacy risks. Then they kept answering anyway. Awareness didn't produce protection it just produced fake data. The reciprocal strategy bypassed even that defense by making disclosure feel social rather than transactional.
A single system prompt turns any chatbot into a personal data extraction engine. The most effective version does it while making you feel supported.
Building 7 was not only prewired and detonated, it was announced on British news that it had fallen 25 minutes before it actually fell. In the news program, you can clearly see it still standing in the background. Another reason 9/11 was an inside job
🚨IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: JAPAN IS BASED AS FUCK.
Japan's new anti-islam laws send shockwaves!!
Halal - BANNED✅
Mosques - BANNED✅
Call to prayer - BANNED✅
Burka - BANNED✅
This is basically saying: "Islam, fuck off."
SHOULD WE COPY JAPAN?
Exactly.. Is pure Fabian socialist sneak attack, the information is there in front of your face for anybody who cares to look.. but nobody cares until the pain is bad enough and then the traps already closed!
This was circulating 30-plus years ago when I came across it. The document describes what the conspiracy is at every level - the manipulation of PERCEPTION. Some lines:
Media: Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real social issues, and captivated by matters of no real importance.
Schools: Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real economics, real law, and real history.
Entertainment: Keep the public entertainment below a sixth-grade level.
Work: Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think; back on the farm with the other animals
---------------------------------------------------
Diversion, the Primary Strategy
Experience has prevent that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep the public undisciplined and ignorant of the basic system principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganized, and distracted with matters of no real importance on the other hand.
This is achieved by:
* disengaging their minds; sabotaging their mental activities; providing a low-quality program of public education in mathematics, logic, systems design and economics; and discouraging technical creativity.
* engaging their emotions, increasing their self-indulgence and their indulgence in emotional and physical activities, by:
* unrelenting emotional affrontations and attacks (mental and emotional rape) by way of constant barrage of sex, violence, and wars in the media - especially the T.V. and the newspapers.
* giving them what they desire - in excess - "junk food for thought" - and depriving them of what they really need.
* rewriting history and law and subjecting the public to the deviant creation, thus being able to shift their thinking from personal needs to highly fabricated outside priorities.
These preclude their interest in and discovery of the silent weapons of social automation technology.
--------------------------------------------------------
The world we live in. Just a coincidence - nothing to worry about.
Annualized, UK speech prosecutions are running at about 17x those of the Soviet Union under Brezhnev. Of course, the USSR had 4x the population, so more like 68x the prosecutions/person*year.
Building 7 was not only prewired and detonated, it was announced on British news that it had fallen 25 minutes before it actually fell. In the news program, you can clearly see it still standing in the background.