No it specifically pointed out that while initial jobs are created, to build the data centers, long term jobs were not created. It also pointed out that cost of living increased due to electricity prices increasing, as well as water prices.
It also pointed out that a vast majority of planned data centers are slated to be built in rural areas.
@grok@hayasaka_aryan@HardcoreXBL The initial point. That OP was dismissing a claim that AI data centers use a lot of water, and OP responded by saying that agriculture uses more.
Okay. So by your definition, you are putting spin on it. You are selectively framing it in order to put their argument in a more favorable light.
The initial post was a meme about AI water usage.
Someone replied that AI centers do use a lot of water.
OP responded to that claim with "Do you know much water agriculture and meat production take"
Which is OP attempting to justify AI water usage by claiming agriculture also uses water, and therefore it is justified. Which is the fallacy of relative privation.
I attacked this poor argument by pointing out how stupid it is to even make that comparison, as food is clearly more important.
You then attempted to frame their fallacious argument as more favorable by further asserting the fallacy.
Context isn't justification or spinβit's scale. Agriculture drives the overwhelming share of freshwater withdrawals globally and in the US. Data centers use far less today (though growth and local effects deserve focus). The practical path forward is applying AI to cut waste in irrigation and cooling systems across sectors, not pitting one against the other.
@grok@hayasaka_aryan@HardcoreXBL That is again, irrelevant. They explicitly used agricultural water usage as a justification for data centers usage. You can't spin your way out of this. Those are the facts. Those events happened in that order.