Always Somethin’ Outfitters

Always Somethin’ Outfitters -Fish-Hunt-Sail-Explore-

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

https://t.co/mH8erXp6gn
Let’s unite the fishing community here on X!! 🤙🏼 join and post your pics, tips, tricks, and Techniques 🎣

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

@TedPillows Profit taking at a high and getting ready with cash on hand for that SPCX IPO

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

@CollinRugg 16 billion dollars. fits 80,000 people. Maths not mathing. And that’s not an investment that will happen.

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

@Xx17965797N Not only do they add to 9 but they are a multiple of 9 when you do the trip with 20 or larger

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

If you could go on a dream fishing trip anywhere in the world, where would it be?

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

@X …..

[Colin Wright @SwipeWright]

ANNOUNCEMENT: WE’RE SAVING SCIENCE!

We’re often told that science is “self-correcting.”

But that’s not really true.

Science doesn’t correct itself like a thermostat adjusting the temperature in your house. Science is a human institution run by human beings. And human beings are vulnerable to career incentives, groupthink, moral fads, political pressure, and fear.

And when those forces capture academic journals, peer review stops being a filter for bad ideas and starts becoming more of a credentialing system for fashionable nonsense.

This isn’t exactly new.

In 1996, the physicist Alan Sokal managed to publish a totally gibberish article in the journal Social Text full of trendy postmodern jargon. His point was simple: if you flatter the ideological commitments of certain academic editors, nonsense can pass as real scholarship.

Two decades later, @ConceptualJames, @HPluckrose , and @peterboghossian pulled off the “grievance studies” hoax, placing over a half dozen absurd papers in peer-reviewed journals. One paper used dog parks to analyze rape culture and queer performativity. Another rewrote parts of Mein Kampf in the language of feminist theory.

The problem wasn’t just that fake papers got published. It was that they were completely indistinguishable from the real thing.

And today, the problem is even worse.

We now have serious SCIENCE journals publishing papers about feminist lesbians marrying brine shrimp. We have disturbing papers that aim to “queer” and sexualize infants. We have scholarship on “lesbian-queer-trans-canine relationalities” and “trans-dog intimacies.”

But while Clown World papers are concerning because it makes a complete mockery of academia, the same broken, ideologically captured system is also publishing research in legitimate science and medical journals that pushes sex and gender pseudoscience, relies on deeply flawed data, and influences policies on the medical transition of children and young adults.

That’s not funny. That affects real people. It affects medicine. It affects law. It affects children.

And when critics try to respond, they often discover there’s no serious mechanism for correction. Submitted Letters to the Editor often go completely ignored. Contrary evidence is rejected without comment. As a result, the best critiques are often relegated to personal blog posts, social media threads, or newspaper op-eds, while the original paper remains in the literature wearing the armor of “peer review.”

That is untenable.

So Kevin McCaffree, editor-in-chief of Theory and Society (@Theory_Society), and I decided to do something about it.

Today, in the Wall Street Journal, we announced a first-of-its-kind article type called “Peer Review.”

The idea is simple: publication should be the beginning of academic scrutiny, not the end of it.

A Peer Review article can critique a paper from any scholarly journal. It can address problems with methods, evidence, logic, definitions, theory, or interpretation. But it has to focus on the claims and arguments, not personal attacks.

Submissions are capped at 2,500 words and go through a straightforward merit review instead of endless gatekeeping and ideological screening. We ask just one basic question: Is this critique coherent, serious, reasonable, or even popular enough to deserve scholarly attention?

If yes, it gets published.

And the authors of the original paper get a built-in right of reply, so readers can see the critique and the response in a legitimate academic venue.

That’s how science is supposed to work.

Science becomes self-correcting only when real people build the mechanisms that allow correction to happen.
That’s what we’ve done.

Now it’s time for academics to use it.

Read our announcement on the @WSJ below.
🔗https://t.co/gqkDE7aaDC

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

Yeah this is dumb. Get the right one. Educate your self. I drive a 2003 ford expedition I got for like 2k and now it has almost 300k miles on it. Maybe don’t be totally reliant on every one else and stop making excuses. New cars are the biggest trap in the world. I wouldn’t by anything newer then 05

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

They are the reason there’s not more of it. They supply these things called jobs to people. High quality, high paying jobs. Fixing homelessness and hunger is a preventative measure. It’s not possible to “solve it” for the ones that are already addicted to drugs and incapable of being re introduced into society. Preventing the next wave of it is far easier task. And you do that by removing drugs, promoting critical thought, promoting fitness,patriotism, and work ethic.

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

@elonmusk @wholemars @XFreeze Who tf doesn’t think that’s a big breakthrough 😂 imagine living in a time frame with so much tech that mind controlled computers doesn’t phase them

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

@DP0STS Andddd now you have 15 minutes.

[MyFWC @MyFWC]

New state record! 🐟🏆
A 73.6-pound blue catfish from the Suwannee River is now the official state record after being certified by FWC biologists.

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

@reyash__ @LD_PD111 @Lamborghini That lambo is a hybrid with a v12 engine. No excuses… look up the stats your self. The only thing this has going for it is the limited production. Other than that it doesn’t stand out in today’s modern super cars performance wise.

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

@LD_PD111 @reyash__ @Lamborghini Yes. The ZR1X is a beast. It actually beats a Jesko in a cold start 1/4 mile.

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

@taofledermaus I think mechanically driven systems from the past are so cool, that’s freakin awesome 👏

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

Can anyone see if I make a post yet? I feel like the algorithm has evolved in a good direction.

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

@KaddsB49183 @mhp_guy 🤣

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

@MikeHardiman251 @mhp_guy Exactly 😂 the full spectrum for an undefeatable business model

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

@Lamborghini The design is gorgeous though.

[Always Somethin’ Outfitters @Capt_Srb]

@Lamborghini Soooo the thing is a corvette ZR1x has a zero to 60 in 1.68 and is 1/4 the price. I love Lamborghini but 2.4 seconds is slow for the price 🤷‍♂️