Defiant and Proud

#Unjabbed and #PureBlood #Christian #ProLife #Constitution #MAGA #Liberty #Nullify #FormerFetus #2ndAmendment #Nationalist
Proverbs 24:10-12
Revelation 2:9

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

@JohnBelEdwards Don't flatter yourself. You were one of our worst Governors ever.

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

Back when Barack Obama was in office, people so much as hung a crude effigy in their backyard and—surprise—the United States Secret Service came knocking. Not kicking down doors, not hauling people off in chains—but absolutely showing up, asking questions, making it very clear: “Hey… maybe don’t flirt with imagery that looks like a threat against the President.”

Because, you know, that’s literally their job.

Fast forward to 2026, and we’ve apparently entered the Upside Down.

Now you’ve got a major network personality like Jimmy Kimmel on Jimmy Kimmel Live! tossing out a “joke” that just happens to wink and nod in the direction of assassinating Donald Trump… and the response?

Laughter. Applause. Back pats all around.

“Ha ha ha! Brilliant! Edgy! So brave!”

Really?

So let’s get this straight:

A guy hangs a dumb doll in a tree → federal agents show up to ask what exactly he thinks he’s doing.

A nationally broadcast comedian floats a thinly-veiled assassination gag → cue the laugh track and corporate sponsors nodding along like bobbleheads.

We’re not talking about partisan preference here—we’re talking about whether suggesting violence against a sitting or former President is treated like a serious matter… or a punchline, depending on who the target is.

And somehow, magically, the standard isn’t consistent.

Funny how that works.

It’s almost like the rules didn’t change—just who they get applied to.

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

Seven days.

An entire week has come and gone—and over at Disney / ABC, apparently the punchline still hasn’t worn off.

Still chuckling.
Still smirking.
Still treating a “joke” about assassinating a sitting President like it’s just another clever late-night zinger.

¿¿¿ Ha. Ha. Ha. ???

Because nothing says classy entertainment quite like flirting with political violence and calling it comedy. Nothing says responsible broadcasting like shrugging your shoulders and hoping outrage just quietly expires on its own.

Seven days—and not a shred of self-awareness. Not a hint of, “Hey, maybe joking about killing a President isn’t peak comedic brilliance.” Nope. Just business as usual, because apparently the bar isn’t low anymore—it’s been buried.

But sure… keep laughing. That says everything.

Oh... @Allstate, @McDonalds, @Starbucks, @Apple, @Instacart, @KITKAT, @Venmo, @jcpenney, @SmirnoffEurope, and @ATT ... we also have options about who we spend out money with. And it isn't with sponsors of grotesque jokes about assassinating Presidents.

[Erik-Unchained @ErikUnchained]

Remember when comedy was funny?

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

Putting kittens in an oven doesn’t make them biscuits. Everyone with even the faintest grasp of reality understands that. Changing the environment doesn’t change the nature of the thing.

In the very same way, placing an apostate in a church building doesn’t magically transform him into a Christian. You can sit in the pew, sing the hymns, nod during the sermon, and carry a Bible so worn it looks like it survived the Reformation — and still be just as lost as the day you walked in.

A garage doesn’t turn you into a car. A hospital doesn’t make you a doctor. And a church building does not — and never has — turned unbelievers into saints.

Scripture makes this painfully clear. “For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel” (Romans 9:6). There have always been people among the visible people of God who were never truly His.

Jesus Himself warned that the visible church would be full of pretenders. “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 7:21). Many will speak the language of faith, wear the costume of religion, and yet remain strangers to the grace of God.

Christianity is not conferred by proximity, attendance, or ritual. It is not inherited by sitting on a church bench any more than holiness is absorbed through the upholstery.

A Christian is someone whom God has made alive (Ephesians 2:4-5), someone born again by the Spirit of God (John 3:3), someone whose heart has been changed by divine grace.

So, I repeat — putting kittens in an oven doesn’t make them biscuits.

And putting an apostate in a church doesn’t make him a Christian. It just means there’s an apostate sitting in a church.

[Dan Bongino @dbongino]

I worked with Hillary Clinton.
She was evil.
The stories agents around her have, and have kept bottled up inside, are horrendous.
Working on her detail was generally considered a punishment assignment.
You will never meet a more mercenary and destructive public figure in your lifetime.
She hates you. All of you.

[Alec Lace @AlecLace]

🚨 Stephen King got a 4-F deferment during Vietnam

Today he blasted Trump for his 4-F

But he was silent on Biden's 4-F exemption

Hypocrisy much?

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

Regardless of where you land on the Iran strikes, can we please stop this absurd reflex of branding Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Rand Paul, and Thomas Massie as “Democrats”? That’s not strategy. That’s middle-school playground nonsense. Slapping a lazy label on someone because they dissent on a single issue doesn’t make you principled — it makes you unserious.

We look ridiculous when we cannibalize our own allies over one disagreement. Disagreement is not betrayal. Tactical differences are not ideological treason. These are people who, on the overwhelming majority of core issues, have stood shoulder-to-shoulder with the very movement now trying to exile them with name-calling.

It’s genuinely heartbreaking to watch us tear at each other like rabid dogs simply because someone deviated from the approved script on one vote, one policy, one moment in time. If we cannot distinguish between a strategic disagreement and an actual adversary, then we’re doing our opponents’ work for them.

Grow up. Debate the issue. Defend your position. But stop pretending that every ally who disagrees with you for five minutes has suddenly switched parties. That kind of childish tribalism doesn’t strengthen our cause — it weakens it.

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

Regardless of where you land on the Iran strikes, can we please stop this absurd reflex of branding Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Rand Paul, and Thomas Massie as “Democrats”? That’s not strategy. That’s middle-school playground nonsense. Slapping a lazy label on someone because they dissent on a single issue doesn’t make you principled — it makes you unserious.

We look ridiculous when we cannibalize our own allies over one disagreement. Disagreement is not betrayal. Tactical differences are not ideological treason. These are people who, on the overwhelming majority of core issues, have stood shoulder-to-shoulder with the very movement now trying to exile them with name-calling.

It’s genuinely heartbreaking to watch us tear at each other like rabid dogs simply because someone deviated from the approved script on one vote, one policy, one moment in time. If we cannot distinguish between a strategic disagreement and an actual adversary, then we’re doing our opponents’ work for them.

Grow up. Debate the issue. Defend your position. But stop pretending that every ally who disagrees with you for five minutes has suddenly switched parties. That kind of childish tribalism doesn’t strengthen our cause — it weakens it.

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

Let’s clear something up for the perpetually confused…

Taking proactive steps to protect American citizens from the possibility of a nuclear attack is called leadership. It’s called national defense. It’s called doing the most basic duty of a President — safeguarding the lives of the people he swore an oath to protect.

It is not “boot-licking.”

It’s not subservience.

It’s not waving someone else’s flag.

There’s a vast difference between advancing American security interests and groveling at the feet of another nation. Some people seem incapable of distinguishing between strategic alignment and blind allegiance — as if any overlap of interests automatically means surrender.

Here’s a simple concept:
If a hostile regime openly chants “Death to America,” funds proxies who attack our interests, and pursues nuclear capability — addressing that threat isn’t servitude. It’s common sense.

Protecting Americans from mushroom clouds isn’t foreign policy weakness. It’s strength.

And if someone can’t tell the difference between defending their own country and “licking boots,” that says far more about their worldview than it does about the policy in question.

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

Bush Junior once compared North Korea and Iran as part of an “axis of evil” — grouping them with Iraq as threats to the United States. In his 2002 State of the Union address, he used that phrase to describe Iran, Iraq, and North Korea as hostile regimes pursuing weapons of mass destruction and supporting terrorism.

While both North Korea and Iran were undeniably hostile to American interests, they really don’t compare with each other in terms of strategic mindset or how they value life and death.

One of the fundamental differences Trump faced with Iran — that he did not face with North Korea — is theological, not merely geopolitical.

The leadership of Iran had the will to destroy us. But for decades they were missing the means to do so. We, on the other hand, had both the means and, under this administration, the will. Here’s the uncomfortable reality of national survival: whoever has both the means and the will to destroy the other, survives.

And for Iran, part of that will was rooted in belief — a worldview where martyrdom is not a tragedy, but a triumph. From childhood, many are taught that dying for the cause is not loss, but gain. Death in service of the revolution is framed as glory, honor, even spiritual promotion. That kind of belief changes the strategic calculus entirely.

North Korea, by contrast, operates from a very different premise. Kim Jong-un — the so-called “Rocket Man” — is not motivated by visions of paradise. His regime’s power rests on survival. Preservation. Control. Death ends the dynasty. Death ends the throne. In their ideology, when you die — that’s it. No glory. No afterlife bonus round. Just the end.

That distinction matters.

You cannot negotiate deterrence the same way with a leadership class that believes death may be an upgrade.

Whether you agree with Trump’s strikes against Iran or not, confrontation was never a question of if. The ideological hostility of the Iranian regime toward the United States and Israel has been consistent for decades. “Death to America” is not a metaphorical slogan — it’s embedded doctrine.

Negotiations may delay. They rarely transform deeply rooted revolutionary theology.

So the real question was never whether tension would escalate.

The question was timing.

Now — before nuclear capability.

Or later — after nuclear capability.

Because once a regime that glorifies martyrdom possesses nuclear weapons, the strategic risk multiplies beyond conventional deterrence models.

At the end of the day, that was the decision point.

Not if.

But when.

And in matters of national survival, those differences are not academic.

They are decisive.

[U.S. Senator John Fetterman @SenFettermanPA]

Let’s see who grieves for that garbage.

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

@nypost Well, 80 year old ought not go effing around with ICE.

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

Oh, here we go again…

The media breathlessly announces that Donald Trump is polling at 39% approval, complete with dramatic music, furrowed brows, and panels of “experts” predicting the end of Western civilization.

But funny how they never quite get around to mentioning this little gem:

👉 Democrats in Congress are sitting at roughly 18% approval.

Eighteen.

That’s not “red wave panic.” That’s not “statistical noise.” That’s not “margin of error.”

That’s less than half of Trump’s approval rating.

So while headlines scream, “Trump underwater!” they conveniently forget to mention that Democratic legislators are scuba diving without oxygen.

If 39% is supposed to be catastrophic… what exactly is 18%? Political hospice care?

The reality is this:

• Trump’s approval is polarized — yes.
• But Democrats in Congress are bleeding support across the board.
• Institutional trust in their leadership is collapsing.
• Even many independents — and some Democrats — are unimpressed.

Yet the coverage? Wall-to-wall doom for Republicans… radio silence on the Democratic dumpster fire.

Why?

Because the narrative matters more than the numbers.

The media loves a “Trump in trouble” storyline.
They’re far less interested in explaining why congressional Democrats can’t even break 20%.

So no — it’s not all gloom and doom for Republicans.

When the other side is polling at 18%, that’s not momentum.
That’s a warning label.

But don’t expect the headlines to tell you that part.

[Kevin Sorbo @ksorbs]

Dear Iryna: the Dems have forgotten you. I’m sorry

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

Let me get this out of the way right up front so nobody accuses me of being a fanboy for the other side: I do not like Microsoft. I’ve spent decades dealing with their half-baked updates, UI whiplash, forced reboots, and their uncanny ability to fix one thing while breaking three others. I’ve cursed Windows more times than I can count.

And yet—somehow—Apple still manages to be worse. Exponentially worse. Not accidentally. Not clumsily. But deliberately, methodically, and profitably.

If Microsoft treats users like an inconvenience, Apple treats them like a renewable revenue stream that needs to be harvested on a predictable schedule.
https://t.co/FdA2aA6Syo

[Gunther Eagleman™ @GuntherEagleman]

Barack Obama was the most divisive and racist President in American history, and it’s not even close.

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

The Lion King video Trump reposted is suddenly declared “racist”—of course. And yet, somehow, everyone conveniently skips right over the fact that White Democrats are portrayed as apes in the very same clip.

Funny how that works.

When it hits their opponents, it’s moral outrage and breathless headlines. When it hits their own side, it’s selective blindness and awkward silence. The standard isn’t principle—it’s partisan convenience.

Democrats don’t just move the goalposts; they pretend the field doesn’t exist. And shame? That was clearly jettisoned a long time ago, right along with intellectual honesty.

[Alec Lace @AlecLace]

🚨 WATCH: That "racist" clip everyone’s melting down over? It’s from an AI Lion King parody video that auto-scrolled on Trump’s feed.

Everyone’s an animal. Trump is the lion KING of the jungle
Dems are various animals. Obamas included. No targeted racism

Classic Fake outrage

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

@TimFollows1776 @tracied51 @MeghanMcCain @FBI Dang, you're down to 26 now. You're going the wrong way!

[Defiant and Proud @CaptainDefiant]

Why Does Life Keep Hitting So Hard?
A word for people who are tired of getting knocked down

Most people don’t wake up one morning and decide, “Yeah, today feels like a good day to wreck my life.”

Nobody plans this.

And yet… here we are.

Some people lose jobs.
Some lose families.
Some lose freedom.
Some lose trust.
Some lose themselves.

And at some point—quietly or out loud—every man asks the same questions:

Why does life keep hitting me?
What did I do to deserve this?
If God is real… where was He?

If you’ve asked those questions, you’re not weak.

You’re human.
https://t.co/6NE2izCWlN