The bull market will last until November–October, screenshot it. I’m the only one who understands this — there won’t be 5–10 x growth like before, and growth for a whole year — now the timeframe and returns are compressed. Right now, a 50 % growth in a token is already a good profit, and in the near future it will correct back to previous lows — because there are no more cycles. BIG GUYS IN JACKETS ARE TAKING THE CREAM
@SantinoCripto Lol, this “bullish” market of yours will last for about two months. ALL RIGHT, GUYS, THE MARKET IS BROKEN — THERE ARE NO MORE CYCLES. IT’S TIME TO WAKE UP AND STOP LOOKING AT THE MARKET THROUGH THE PRISM OF CYCLES.
2/2 Practical application
Logistics and supply chains — tracking goods (IBM Food Trust based on Fabric) while concealing commercial terms from competitors.
Financial settlements between banks — interbank payments and clearing without disclosing transaction details to third parties.
Healthcare — sharing medical data between organizations while complying with patient privacy requirements.
Trade finance — platforms such as https://t.co/ZKettXLc8a are built on Hyperledger Fabric specifically because of the privacy requirements of transactions.
1/2 Hyperledger Blockchain: Technology for Business 🤔
So, my dear fellow digital hustlers, it’s time to talk about and explain what CBDCs are built on, and once again insult Ripple and Bitcoin fans — because these assets are garbage.😌🔥
What is Hyperledger
Hyperledger is an umbrella open-source project created in 2015 by the Linux Foundation to develop enterprise-grade blockchain technologies. Okay? I hope everything is clear here.
Unlike public blockchains such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, Hyperledger was originally designed for businesses: banks, logistics companies, healthcare providers, manufacturers, and government organizations.
The Hyperledger umbrella includes several separate frameworks and tools, the most well-known of which is Hyperledger Fabric. There is also Hyperledger Besu (an Ethereum-compatible platform for enterprises), Hyperledger Indy (for decentralized identity), and a number of other projects.
Key difference: privacy instead of publicity
Public blockchains are transparent by default — anyone can see all transactions. For a bank or manufacturer, this is often unacceptable: competitors should not be able to see supply volumes, deal terms, or financial flows. Hyperledger solves this problem through a permissioned blockchain architecture: only pre-approved organizations can participate in the network and view the data.
How Hyperledger Fabric works
Channels — separate private “subnets” within the overall network, where transactions are visible only to participants of a specific channel. For example, a supplier and one of the retailers can conduct settlements in their own channel, invisible to everyone else.
Private data collections — allow sensitive data to be shared only with a specific subset of channel participants, while the hash of the data is still recorded for everyone as proof.
Modular consensus architecture — unlike the garbage Bitcoin with its energy-intensive Proof-of-Work, Fabric allows different consensus mechanisms to be connected depending on the needs of the business.
Smart contracts (chaincode) — are written in familiar languages such as Go, Java, and JavaScript, rather than specialized languages like Solidity.
Modular Membership Service Provider (MSP) — manages who can enter the network and with what permissions, making it easier to comply with corporate policies and regulatory requirements.
Regarding anonymity and confidentiality:
Hyperledger implements them through similar but different mechanisms, and this is worth understanding before deployment.
Confidentiality (which is usually what businesses need) is achieved through channels and private data collections — the contents of transactions are hidden from unauthorized network participants.
Anonymity/pseudonymity of individual parties to a transaction is provided through additional mechanisms:
Idemix (Identity Mixer) — a cryptographic protocol built into Fabric that allows a participant to prove that they are authorized to perform a transaction (for example, that they are an accredited supplier) without revealing who they actually are. This is a form of zero-knowledge proof.
The ability to use pseudonymous identifiers instead of the real names of companies in the publicly visible part of transactions.
Flexible endorsement policies, which make it possible to hide even the fact of which specific organizations participated in approving a particular transaction.
So, a corporation can actually build a network in such a way that: (1) competitors and outsiders cannot see the network or transactions at all; (2) even participants within the same network do not always know who exactly is behind a particular operation. This is not “anonymity” in the sense of crypto mixers used to conceal illegal activity, but rather a tool for commercial confidentiality and protecting sensitive business data while maintaining auditability for regulators and authorized parties.
Basically, he is right (although I’m not a supporter of Bitcoin, and even an opponent of it), but this is a reasonable position. Saylor is essentially flipping the narrative: the industry shouldn’t wait for regulators’ approval to develop — it should prove its viability through products and adoption while lawmakers work on the framework. Two years of free-market competition without strict legislative restrictions is a chance for the best teams to pull ahead (and for us as well), rather than slowing down while waiting for the perfect law.
@cryptorover The thing is, Saylor himself doesn’t actually own Bitcoin. He makes money by attracting liquidity, so he dances around Bitcoin, but his income formula is built on something else.
CBDC WON’T HAPPEN??? 🤔🔥💀
So, I want to explain all the hype surrounding CBDC, what they are and how they work.
Many people think that this is a currency that we will supposedly use, that it will be controlled, that our payments will be monitored and blocked for any reason.
But that’s not the case. CBDC is a currency for banks, and exclusively for banks. It will be on Hyperledger (which will allow transactions between banks to be anonymous).
And authorities are using this. They are manipulating this misunderstanding among the masses.
And the irony is that instead of CBDCs, they are pushing stablecoins on us, which, in fact, can also be tracked and blocked.
But compared to CBDC, the idea of stablecoins sounds sweeter: “low fees,” “fast transfers,” “transparency,” “we will be able to see the reserves.”
But when it comes to truly large transactions, just as we haven’t been able to see them, we won’t be able to see them, because they will take place on an anonymous corporate blockchain. Meanwhile, they will be able to see our payments.