I am thrilled to announce that I will be joining @AuburnU@AuburnEngineers in Chemical Engineering as an Assistant Professor in January 2022! War Eagle! My lab will develop & apply novel materials/polymers for membranes & other processes in water treatment & resource recovery.
We also thank key funding sources for this work, including @NSF for the NSF-GRFP of C. Porter and R. DuChanois and for @NEWTCenter, and the 2018–2020 @NWRIwater - @AMTAorg Fellowship for Membrane Technology awarded to C. Porter.
Excited to announce our newly released research article, “Tethered Electrolyte Active-Layer Membranes,” @J_Membrane_Sci, with big thanks to
@TheElimelechLab, @MingjiangZhong, @rduchanois, @Erika_MacD1 , and Scarlet-Marie Kilpatrick. Access: https://t.co/IWI9XyPyh3
Bottom-up synthesis of TEAMs affords a high degree of control and tailor ability that are instrumental in fundamentally understanding membrane transport and in enhancing selectivity. TEAMs reside at the precipice of applications like resource recovery and water softening.
Excited to see our lab’s research featured in the video of the @Yale campaign ‘For Humanity’
@YaleEnvEng @YaleSEAS
https://t.co/DuYWM3JqTc
#Vimeo https://t.co/2WQFzxOqc8
Strategies that the United States pursues under the infrastructure act will determine service quality, equity, resiliency, cybersecurity, climate preparedness, and costs for generations. Build back wiser: https://t.co/mIkhUGojsc
@justletitgo101 @AveragePm@joshsoren151@tiredgenerally Two, science takes resources such as space, time, materials, and energy, which are limited. I think you think science is like magic. Wave your hand and all problems can be solved. Not so. Some of the best solutions are preventative. You don’t seem to like those…
@justletitgo101 @AveragePm@joshsoren151@tiredgenerally One, it would at the current fertility rate. You are arguing to maintain a fertility rate that would eventually lead to this unless the fertility rate does go down (which you also don’t want). I don’t think you understand math.
@justletitgo101 @AveragePm@joshsoren151@tiredgenerally If every inch of the world is covered a thousand humans thick, where do we grow food? Where does all the waste go? Explain how that works.
@justletitgo101 @AveragePm@joshsoren151@tiredgenerally I have never said “I support Malthus.” I am telling you how scientifically there are limited sources. I cannot understand how you think mass and matter can be created. Newton’s laws of conservation of mass show this cannot be done.
@justletitgo101 @AveragePm@joshsoren151@tiredgenerally Wrong. Moderate. I said “case-by-case.” I fully agree with certain things on both the left and right. Try again.
@justletitgo101 @AveragePm@joshsoren151@tiredgenerally Is your only criteria for “progressive” the pronoun specification? What other criteria do I meet for “progressive?”
@BakaKarasu @justletitgo101 @joshsoren151@tiredgenerally They correctly identify that below 2.1, the population begins to fall. Has to do with mortality versus birth rate, not size of population. 2 folks per 2 children in their lifetime, plus premature death (the 0.1 part) maintains. This stands regardless of starting population size.
@BakaKarasu @justletitgo101 @joshsoren151@tiredgenerally Yes, I understand the math. Growth, maintenance, and decline all can occur with fertility rate decline, depending on how much decline. Many developed countries are choosing to have fewer kids without any restrictions imposed to a point where population is decreasing.
@justletitgo101 @AveragePm@joshsoren151@tiredgenerally I take particular stances case-by-case, based on logic, morals, data, and projected consequences. You’ll be surprised to know some of the ideas I support that are not “progressive.” You may want to stop stereotyping based solely on someone writing their pronouns on their bio.