@paleochristcon@IanCarrollShow Bro, it’s insane how terrified Candace’s fans are of her having to defend her claims. They supposedly believe her theories, yet suddenly none of them are confident. And all while saying that you're not a good debater. The hysteria is wild.
@CristinaCrisp3@Dylan_Hurleyh2@paleochristcon If you still think Andrew is running after reading these posts, you must be mentally ill. Go tell tour queen to accept the prompt. both made claims, both get to defend their own claims .
All evening the Candace Owens people have been saying she makes no claims so she doesn’t have to defend any.
They claim I said there was overwhelming evidence for the prosecution of Robinson which is true I said that so I meed to defend it .
However, Candace did make a reverse claim. She said there is overwhelming evidence Robinson was set up by the feds as a patsy.
So I will take the position that the evidence is more compelling that Tyler was a lone shooter not set up by the feds. She takes the position of her claim, which she says has overwhelming evidence he was a patsy put there by the feds. If she agrees, then we are all set.
How the hell can anybody argue against me here? We both made claims. We both defend them.
@EnterDaCupgeon@paleochristcon Biased much, doofus? She claimed on her streams there’s overwhelming evidence Tyler was set up as a patsy among other stuff, and now she’s weaseling out by narrowing the debate to whether her claims are just 'viable’ she knows she can't defend her wild claims
Topic: Is there better evidence against Tyler Robinson for the murder of Charlie Kirk than any alternative theory presented by Candace Owens"
Sound good?
From the exchange, she explicitly rejected the one-hour cross-examination as a "weird stipulation" and framed the debate solely around the state's evidence against Robinson. Andrew conditioned agreement on her claims also being cross-examined. Her reply addressed only the ad-hom rule then declared agreement without clarifying or accepting that condition. This leaves the scope ambiguous and her affirmative claims less directly testable than a standard cross-exam format would require.
@marsha85905@paleochristcon@RealCandaceO Can you read idiot? Candace still hasnt said in this negotiation that she Will allow to be cross examined on her claims.
Then we have an agreement if you agree to have your claims cross examined. This debate isn't specific to just the evidence against Robinson by the state. That's improper framing. Its a debate ALSO about YOUR CLAIMS regarding this case and Kirks assasination. Do you agree you also need to support claims YOU HAVE MADE as well? If so then I agree to the terms. Also no personal attacks no ad homs. If one is made that person loses by default enforced by the moderator. Do we have terms? If so say so and we will book it for friday.
@Charlierankin13@TiffanyLong77@paleochristcon You don’t seem confident about Candace having to defend her wild claims. This is a debate, both sides should be under scrutiny. Andrew challenged Candace directly on the Joe Rogan podcast on her positions, and she knows it.
@paleochristcon Make sure to have it on récord saying that she Will defend her wild claims. so far it seems that she's gonna pull stew Peters and dodge
@ronaldofan30@paleochristcon You people are retarded. What Is this suppossed to mean?
"Guy: “Okay, I’ll pay you the $500,000, but you also have to pay me $500,000.”"
@Bob_Loblaw_Esq@CrimKingson_@paleochristcon That doesnt mean you work for them ,you can be independent or volunteer,retard. Andrew made the offer live, just like Candy did (Nice double standard)I see Candy dropped her initial demand that TPUSA claim him, since that makes it look like shes tryin to weasel out of the debate
@Bob_Loblaw_Esq@CrimKingson_@paleochristcon Hey, spergy, its taking Candace 8 hours to come up with a response to Andrews offer. “She’s gotta be quicker than that” remember? (Nice double standard) Obviously, she demanded Erika claim him, knowing Andrew doesnt work for them, to give herself an out to avoid the debate
@Rach4Patriarchy Who cares about the smoking stuff. Lets talk about the other demands that are obviously a free out to not do the debate .that bitch knows well Andrew doesn't work for tpusa