Living a blessed life on a farm with copious amounts of animals and a dear husband- combat vet, BJ’s sommelier, occasional heavy equipment operator, attorney
@RpsAgainstTrump The sad thing is that Trump is surrounded by people that put this together for him. No one was like “Mr Pres. this is a bad idea…” or if they did he still went through with it.
@RepLuna Come on now. She accidentally touched you. She did not “hit” you. I’ve liked that you stand tough on some issues but you’re in the wrong on this one.
@Landscapecture For the 1k people who liked this video -please realize that just because AI creates a picturesque video does not make this a good idea. I wonder how long it will take private equity to invest in skilled trades. The world needs them more than ever.
@JustinWStapley Thank you. I agree. My loyalty is not beholden to a party that ignores the basic tenets of what it stands for. I will not vote for a candidate simply bc of a R next to the name. I’m not sacrificing my own respect on the alter of false narratives to appease reprobates.
@Mt2Aguy How do you still believe Israel is “defending” their country? They have invaded, destroyed and occupied southern Lebanon and are talking about more countries.
@justinamash@LibertarianMama High five. You are correct. And instead of Congress doing what they should do and tell the president he needs Congress to go to war -congress is whimpering in corner trying not to make eye contact with the president or voters.
@MattWalshBlog@greggnunziata You are getting so close to saying/admitting we went to war with Iran bc Israel wanted that and we’re still at war bc Israel wants us at war with Iran. Almost there! Bravo!
@tgiovanetti I would like to believe that there are still conservatives in Congress. Evidence that they exist shrinks more and more every day Trump is in office. Do you see the existence of any conservatives (neo conservatives don’t count)?
@JustinWStapley I think we need rank choice voting. That would help avoid the extremes on both sides. Both parties don’t want it so it seems like a logical step but we also need to get rid of citizens United.
@AgentCoopr702@tgiovanetti How are you not understanding English? If we did not have a write in option I would agree with you. We do have a write so it’s not binary. There are also other candidates from other parties so again not 2 choices.
@AgentCoopr702@tgiovanetti My point is not that a write in candidate will or could win but I’m saying as a voter you can choose to vote for a candidate that will not win. How is that difficult to understand? And I think I’ll have some ice cream for lunch.
@AgentCoopr702@tgiovanetti Incorrect analogy. You can always choose to write in name. And there have been very few instances where the write in candidate won but it has happened so it theatrically possible. Just bc a write in candidate doesn’t win doesn’t mean it wasn’t a choice.
@JonGraySwag@AgentCoopr702@tgiovanetti Im sorry you don’t have respect for yourself as an individual and feel you have to keep putting coins in a system that ignores you. You keep playing the game and get the same results- reprehensible politicians.
@AgentCoopr702@tgiovanetti Yes I’m not arguing about effect- either of those 2 will win. I’m saying it’s not a binary choice bc there are other options that will result in your choice not being the winner.