@FatherChenal@elhigadodmarita@IAlballay Imagine using the same reasoning during the Roman persecutions or the time of Henry VIII. I can’t imagine our glorious martyrs not speaking against the Emperor or the King because the people will have no priest. 😬
@FatherChenal@elhigadodmarita@IAlballay Shame the SSPX accepted the morality on the vaccines and that left it to the individual Catholic to decide on their own. Many probably regretted that.
@theoscholastica Didn’t Popes already said it?
“La Chiesa si trova in un’ora di inquietudine, di autodemolizione…” - Paul VI
“La cultura europea dà l’impressione di un’«apostasia silenziosa» da parte dell’uomo sazio, che vive come se Dio non esistesse” - John Paul II
@colum_mccurdy@BigModernism It must first be proven that an act truly constitutes treason; otherwise, any such charge is morally null. Even Our Lord spoke against the High Priest, and the first Pope himself disobeyed the Sanhedrin when fidelity to God required it.
In ancient times, a Christian who yielded to Roman pressure by offering even a small pinch of incense to the Roman gods was considered to have openly fallen into apostasy. One can only imagine how the early Christians would have reacted if their popes had kissed pagan idols or the sacred writings of false religions.
I really can’t blame any Catholic who is trying to make sense of the current situation in the Church, whether they attend the Novus Ordo or identify as sedevacantist. What many of these people are doing may be wrong or normally condemned, but their underlying desire is simply to see the Catholic Church continue to function even in times of confusion or persecution. I’m not saying their actions are justified—only that I would reserve any definitive condemnation for a restored and functioning Magisterium. Again, I feel like this act would only further division and confusion. May Our Lady obtain the grace for all her children just trying to be faithful to what they think is true Catholicity.
@AndrD1406@ByzantineYurii It wasn’t a sin to recite it since it did not change the faith. I would say that it is not proper to include it in the Greek edition. The same way the EOs are asking Latin Rite Catholics to drop just the “Filioque” but not the other words that are absent in the Greek version.
@AndrD1406@ByzantineYurii The “Filioque” was never in the Greek edition of the Creed, and so does “Deum de Deo” and “Ex Maria Virgine”. If they are to add the Filioque, then the other ones should be added as well.
@BruceSaiFun And during Easter tide?! Only an Antichrist would want to compete against the glory of God and His. Christ. POTUS must publicly repent and repudiate this.
@RealCandaceO@TaylorRMarshall Next time you know, Candace becomes a radtrad Lefebvrist exposing modernist Rome. It is coming, and just a matter of time.
@GloriaS48569@BibleInContext1 Oh wait your sect didn’t exist yet neither in 1182 nor in 1204. Your Gnostic sects weren’t there to oppose anything because your faith came from a man possessed and sits in the toilet to obtain his “revelations”.