Dan C

You're only young once, but you can be immature forever.

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@belamova 😂😂😂

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@ricwe123 I thought NATO started the war?

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@GOP_is_Gutless Speechless? Lmao

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@Gerashchenko_en He wouldn’t last a week against NATO

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@RoKhanna Democrats have yet to be proven right

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@JayZEmc2 @simonateba @MaryjaneMjmalin @elonmusk 😂😂😂

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@simonateba @elonmusk No. I’m not jealous of others success.

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@TheLizVariant N Carolina still pissed they lost the Civil War

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@JemmingKristin @MarioNawfal No. It means Tucker is a liar

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@MarcoFoster_ So produce some proof already!

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@ConciousLabRat Talk about nonsense…

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@bigmosman7777 @JohnPaulJones87 @SteveLovesAmmo You ever been to Charlotte?

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@SteveLovesAmmo They couldn’t the first time

[Flopping Aces @FloppingAces]

This whole “look at the glass room” routine is pure fucking cowardice dressed up as professionalism.

They know exactly what they’re doing. Every time someone asks where these ballots actually came from, who filled them out, or whether the people on the rolls were even real, the response is the same pathetic deflection: “But the counting is so transparent!” As if that answers a goddamn thing. It doesn’t. It never has.

It’s a deliberate tactic to make you feel crazy for noticing that the only part of the process they’re willing to defend is the part that happens after the ballots are already in the system.

They’ll mock you for asking basic questions. They’ll accuse you of being dangerous. They’ll drag out January 6 like a rotting corpse every single time. And they do it because they have no defense for the actual ballots. None.

They can’t explain the late surges that magically appear for the right candidates. They can’t justify why the state refuses to clean its voter rolls. They can’t tell you why someone who lost her own district suddenly benefits from a flood of mail-in votes after the fact. So instead they hide behind the glass and act like you’re the problem for wanting to know what the fuck is actually being counted.

It’s insulting. It’s insulting that they think this obvious shell game still works. It’s insulting that they treat basic chain-of-custody questions like some kind of extremist position. And it’s insulting that they expect people to just nod along while they lecture everyone about “trusting the process” when they refuse to secure or even properly verify the inputs going into that process.

Stop pretending this is about transparency. It’s about contempt. They don’t respect you enough to give a real answer, so they keep pointing at the glass and hoping you’re too stupid to notice what they’re protecting.
(article below)

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@Gianl1974 @31Kelleher @Steffen12Sam @WordWanderer Trump doesn’t work in the Capitol building

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@WordWanderer @31Kelleher @Steffen12Sam @Gianl1974 Obama was an insurrectionist, using Russian Collusion lies to overturn the 2016 election. Should he have been shot and killed?

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@RepSaraJacobs Astronomical statistical improbability is credible evidence of cheating. It’s up to law enforcement to investigate.

[Flopping Aces @FloppingAces]

So we’re really doing this again?

California’s media class wants us to believe that the only thing that matters in an election is how carefully the ballots are counted inside a glass room. That’s the entire defense.

Not where the ballots came from. Not whether the people who filled them out were actually eligible. Not why one candidate somehow gained tens of thousands of votes after she’d already lost her own district and appeared to concede. Just… look at the glass room.

If the process is so obviously clean, why does every basic question about the ballots get treated like a violent threat? Why does asking where these late-arriving votes originated immediately get labeled “election denial” and compared to January 6? Why is the media’s go-to explanation for late ballot surges always some version of “Trump made Republicans hate mail voting” instead of actually examining who cast them?

And why, exactly, does the state that tracks your showerhead water usage suddenly become deeply concerned about “privacy” the moment someone suggests auditing the voter rolls?

If the glass room is supposed to settle everything, why does the entire defense collapse the second anyone asks what’s actually inside the envelopes? Why is the only acceptable conversation the one about how professionally everything was stacked and sorted, while any discussion about whether those ballots should have existed in the first place gets shut down as dangerous?

At what point do we stop pretending this is about transparency and admit it’s about making sure certain questions are never allowed to be asked out loud?
(article below)

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@TerryMoran Seems like you’re trying to convince yourself

[Dan C @CatronDan]

@mark_slapinski 😂😂😂