You're probably losing hours every week to work a machine could do for you.
I build those machines — apps & automations that handle the repetitive stuff:
• Businesses: agents that qualify leads, answer support, kill data entry
• You personally: small tools that quietly run your day in the background
My edge: I can build them to run privately on your own hardware — your data never leaves the building.
That's CeliaLabs.
Got a repetitive task — at work or at home? Drop it below and I'll tell you if it's automatable 👇
Everyone is arguing about which model to use.
Meanwhile the teams shipping working agents are spending their time on:
— tool interfaces the model can actually use
— what goes in the context window, and what doesn’t
— error handling and retries
— orchestration and task decomposition
The model is maybe 20% of the outcome. The harness is the rest.
(Until your task horizon gets long. Then the model becomes the ceiling again.)
Open models closed 80% of the gap. I still pay for both.
I deploy local AI for myself and for clients. Privacy work, volume work, anything repetitive — that all runs local now, at zero marginal cost.
But I keep Claude Pro. Not for better answers — for fewer wasted passes on large codebases. Local models make me babysit context, and that babysitting is the real cost.
Gemini Pro I’d cancel. That’s a convenience tax on ecosystem lock-in, not a capability edge.
Buying back hours beats saving $20.
What’s still on your bill — and what’s keeping it there?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is now live on the DeepSeek API Platform! 🚀
🔹 This experimental multimodal model matches DeepSeek-V4-Flash on text capabilities—including agents, reasoning, and world knowledge.
🔹 On multimodal agent benchmarks, V4-Flash-Vision-Exp makes a major leap over V4-Flash, bringing multimodal agent performance close to Opus-4.8.
Try it with model='deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp'. DeepSeek Harness 0.1.1 was released today with out-of-the-box support for the new model.
1/n
DFlash 2 is the real deal.
Tested it on an M5 Pro MacBook Pro for coding workflows in OpenCode—easily outperforming both MTP and DSpark.
Game-changing acceleration for local models.
Thank you @zhijianliu_! 🔥
DFlash 2 is here! Qwen3.8-27B at 70 tok/s on an M5 Max MacBook Pro.
⚡ Up to 4.6× the speed of autoregressive decoding, with the same output.
This is the next generation of DFlash, seeded at Z Lab and upgraded at Inco AI. Get one more accepted token on every pass, for free!
https://t.co/We0lwYPSBl
Hey @Alibaba_Qwen, the chunky capybaras are cozy on the racks, but our edge devices are starving! 🦫⚡️
When can we get the official smol squad (0.8B, 2B, 4B, 9B)? Let the little guys run free on our laptops! 🚀💻 #Qwen#LocalAI
Qwen3.8-27B on Apple vs NVIDIA
M4 Max (MLX 4-bit):
29.5 tok/s decode · 248 tok/s prefill · 8.6K prompt = ~35s wait
DGX Spark (vLLM NVFP4 + native MTP):
24 tok/s on code, 17 on prose · ~2,000 tok/s prefill · 8.6K prompt = 4.3s
Same Q4 file on the same engine: Mac decodes 2× faster (21 vs 11.5)
that's the memory bus talking. But the Spark ingests context 8× faster, and it's the only one that can use the model's built-in MTP head, no Mac runtime supports it yet.
Mac wins the conversation. Spark wins the moment you paste a document. Same brain, two bodies — buy for your workload.
🧩 DeepSeek Harness v0.1 is now available in Developer Preview!
🔹 We’re opening it up to developers building agent harnesses worldwide and open-sourcing the codebase in MIT license.
🔹 Powered by the Cordis meta-framework, DeepSeek Harness is an agent harness built around one core idea: Everything is a plugin. Models, tools, skills, sessions, sandboxes, filesystems, loops, orchestration, and UI are ALL implemented as plugins, and can be mixed, matched, replaced, and extended.
Try it now!
https://t.co/2YWSvJHhKA