Maybe. Maybe not. The future rarely resembles the past, so absent a good explanation as to *why* birth rates are declining we cannot prophesy what might happen with the numbers next year much less next century:
@DeDunkingPast How you are teaching your son to m to do such things? Many people complain about men today but being able to fix simple stuff but when I ask them if they ever showed it to their sons they say no. I wonder how do they expect the new generation of men to learn?
@ImBreckWorsham Because Israel isn't threatening the West with eradication? You know that small but important detail. That's like asking why is the US allowed to have nuclear weapons?
@charlesmurray This would explain why black people despite lower average IQ contribute so much in the arts especially music. If that is a separate but heritable trait this explains a lot. Would be interesting to know if this trait also varies among ethnic groups.
🧠 Is creativity mostly just high intelligence?
A new twin study in @ICAJournal says no. There’s a large genetically independent component.
@timothycbates analyzed intelligence test scores and creativity data in three domains: business, military, politics/leadership). Key findings:
➡️Creative achievement is highly heritable (h² ≈ .56), shared environment ≈ 0
➡️Latent creativity and general intelligence are genetically independent.
➡️g explains only ~10% of the genetic variance in creative achievement
These findings support a hybrid view: g helps in many domains, but creativity has substantial unique genetic architecture. As Bates explains, "the genetic architecture of real-world creative achievement is not merely a downstream consequence of general intelligence but reflects a separate, heritable system that operates across artistic, scientific, and enterprising domains" (p. 6).
Read the full open-access paper: https://t.co/OxFZ7d0h7y
@sugabelly@BradWilcoxIFS Except women hate men more than men hate women. We see that in many data sets when you ask especially young women about their view on men.