New laws in Afghanistan, introduced by the Taliban, mean that men can now marry girls at any age – there is no limit. Male relatives can arrange this with other men, and it’s only once the girls reach puberty that, in extremely limited circumstances, they can ask a court to dissolve the marriage. What’s happening in that country is horrific, and it begs the question why Amnesty are not putting all of their resources into tackling this latest child abuse atrocity.
Funny how men like Peter never "caution" their porn-addled mates that defining women in ways that prioritise stereotypes and erase biological difference and lifecycle is harmful *in its own right*, without even a need to posit potential further consequences.
Far be it from us, the mere unbepenised, to complicate things by suggesting our bodies matter but not in a bad way. Can't have that. Soz, ladies, it's a bad way or not at all.
Half the time it's "acknowledge sex difference and you'll be reduced to a brood mare", the other half it's "acknowledge sex difference and soon you'll be a massive racist". Oh well, best just settle for woman as fantasy porn sterotype / female human as gestator / bleeder etc.
Rioters in the UK: “We are going to damage cars and buildings and violently attack people”
The Police: “You will be arrested”
Rioters: “We will be wearing Palestinian flags”
Police: “Ah, then have a lovely time”
It appears that (as many of us have suspected for years) Amnesty believes certain kinds of humans don’t deserve rights: women, girls and those who are proudly same-sex attracted. I hope donors from those groups are taking note.