Chanbarider

🔞
There's porn and sometimes opinion
PFP by @DrY3sMan
ENG/ESP

...Need Lana gf

[Chanbarider @Chabarider]

We've come a long way https://t.co/TvGtVepnD4

[おばけ @obakenyankodayo]

コスプレcosplay
ポケモンZA/カナリィ

📸 踊カメさん(＠odorucamera )

[トイシキ【ト壱式】 @toysikisizuoka]

ホットパンツ＋すごいヘアーの
あの娘を再びtoysikiワールドへ召還
ちょい太っっ💕

[Mesias Art (SUMMER COMMISSION OPEN) @mesiasart]

Drasna from Pokemon X/Y Big heart YCH comms for @/Quartermaster56, hope you like it folks!

[ろね🍃 @5uno0nova4]

Summer🌊グレ&シャワ❄️💧

[DeepHumor @DeepHumor]

I'll do the debate with you just like I did with Jon, let's get in touch and come on the channel

[Together @Togetherdec]

"If you oppose Digital ID, take the Pledge and get it in the post" – Rob

Take the Pledge. Post it. Scrap Digital ID.

Join others mailing their Pledges to Andy Burnham this week:
https://t.co/0xUfYn4yEE

#PledgeTogether #ScrapDigitalID

[🏴‍☠️CyberTechWolf🏴‍☠️ @CyberTechWolff]

This account is lobbied by Meta and sponsored by Collective Shout btw if you do enough digging.

[Mololuwa | Cybersecurity - (The God Complex) @cyber_rekk]

The EU now wants to be able to read your private chats directly

Not because you're suspected of a crime

Not because there's a warrant with your name on it

But because the proposal would require private messages, images, and files to be scanned for illegal content before privacy can truly exist

That's the part that should concern everyone reading this

The issue isn't just what the system is looking for today. It's the precedent it creates. Once the infrastructure exists to inspect private communications, the scope of what gets scanned can always be expanded by future legislation

History has shown that surveillance powers rarely become narrower over time, they tend to grow and become wider

End-to-end encryption has always been built on a simple promise: your conversation belongs to you and the person you're talking to. If every message must first be analyzed by software before it's allowed to remain private, then privacy is no longer the starting point, Inspection becomes the new starting point

This is much bigger than one piece of legislation

It's about redefining what private communication means in the digital age. Once governments normalize the idea that every private conversation should be subject to automated inspection, it becomes much harder to argue that any conversation is truly private at all

Bruhhhhhhhhhhh

[Espiritu @OtakuEspiritu]

Running to the EU is pointless for people in the UK because they are trying to push it down the same path it seems.

[Kelly McCarty @KellyLMcCarty]

We must protect our Constitutional rights.

[NXT EU @NXT4EU]

The current version of Chat Control is not only bad for privacy, it is also a sovereignty risk giving US big-tech the power to syphon data to US NCMEC.

NCMEC acts as central hub that checks vast amounts of data, accessible by US intelligence services.

@EPPGroup, shame on you.

[Julie Barrett @juliecbarrett]

To be clear: the KIDS Act does not "empower parents." It will require every user to provide verified identity data to access the internet. Tech companies will be incentivized to collect massive amounts of behavioral data on children to ensure compliance with the law.

The bill also creates a new government agency to create the rules on age verification.

Parents need tools, not government mandates that are effectively a digital ID.

[wukko @uwukko]

everyone who voted for chat control should not be in the EU parliament

realistically though, what are they gonna do? force all ISPs to install DPI nodes and block all e2ee messaging platforms that don't comply with scanning? just like china and russia? for real?

[Sebastián Lukomski @lukomski_sebito]

😡Below is a list of MEPs who agree with having your private messages scanned and surveilled:

[Interesting AF @interesting_aIl]

The EU is trying to revive 'chat control,' a legislative proposal that allows tech companies to scan your messages, images, and files for illegal content

[leo 🐾 @synthwavedd]

To my EU friends: The European Parliament are attempting, for the sixth time time - after five rejected attempts! - to force through Chat Control, a measure that will fundamentally undermine your right to privacy online. Don't let them!

https://t.co/WXE9KKNNzc

[EromancerSFW @EromancerSFW]

You don't need mass surveillance to protect kids.

Something anyone can post for any of these propaganda accounts that are arguing practical parental controls do not currently exist.

Detailed checklist in the replies.

[Zeluvy 🐍🎩 @SnakeHoppe]

Democracy in a nutshell