I’m Helping

@DataRepublican @data_republican Good advice. It won’t be over until they find enough votes to achieve the outcome they desire. Look up Dean Logan and his history with running fair elections.

425

I’m Helping

@Chadbourne1968

11 days ago

@camhigby @GovSherrillNJ @grok is there any proof that these rioters were released already?

Chadbourne1968 retweeted

Secretary Sean Duffy

@SecDuffy

11 days ago

🚨WATCH: THE FUTURE OF AVIATION IS TAKING OFF🚨 It was an honor to become the first U.S. Transportation Secretary to fly in an eVTOL🇺🇸 Now we’re taking the future of flight to the next level with projects across 26 states that include testing of:  ✅ Urban air taxis ✅ Emergency medical flights ✅ Regional travel   America will WIN the race for the next generation of aviation @BETA_aircraft @FAANews 🦅

150

406

235K

Chadbourne1968 retweeted

Sports Patriot

@SportsPatriotUS

12 days ago

I’m going to say this as calmly as possible: Watching Caitlin Clark in the WNBA has become genuinely hard to stomach. Not because she struggles sometimes. Not because she makes mistakes. Not because she gets criticized. That comes with being great. It’s hard to stomach because it has become obvious that the league, the officials, the media, the players, and even her own organization have all decided that the most important thing is not letting Caitlin Clark become too big. And that is insane. This league was handed the most marketable, electric, revenue-generating player women’s basketball has ever seen, and instead of building around the moment, too many people seem obsessed with humbling her. She gets fouled. Held. Hit. Cheap-shotted. Mocked. Targeted. Then when she reacts like a normal competitor, suddenly everyone wants to analyze her attitude. No. Her attitude is not the story. The story is that a generational player is being treated like a problem by the very league she helped drag into mainstream relevance. This reminds me of the worst kind of youth coach... the one who sees a special player, feels threatened by her talent, and slowly drains the joy out of her in the name of “teaching humility.” That is what this looks like. The freedom she played with at Iowa is disappearing. The fire is still there, but the joy looks damaged. The confidence looks weighed down. She looks like someone constantly fighting the refs, opponents, narratives, coaching decisions, jealousy, and a league culture that should be protecting its golden opportunity instead of resenting it. And let’s be honest: Stephanie White has not helped. Benching Caitlin Clark randomly when she is controlling the game tempo, or having your best shooter off the floor in critical game ending minutes when a victory is within reach is basketball malpractice. Limiting her rhythm, downplaying her greatness, benching momentum, and treating her like just another piece instead of the engine is absurd. You do not take a player who changed the economics of your sport and manage her like you’re afraid her greatness might offend the room. Nike deserves criticism too. Other players get signature shoes rolled out with urgency, while the biggest draw in women’s basketball is somehow still waiting on that signature shoe. That is not confusing. That is revealing. Fans are not stupid. They see the fouls. They see the double standards. They see the jealousy. They see the media resentment. They see the league benefiting from her popularity while refusing to fully embrace her. And here is the part the WNBA better understand quickly: People are not tuning in to watch Caitlin Clark be humbled. They are tuning in to watch Caitlin Clark be great. If she walked away tomorrow, the fans would follow her. The sponsors would follow her. The energy would follow her. The high salaries and the charter jets would follow her. And the league would be forced to confront the uncomfortable truth it keeps trying to avoid: Caitlin Clark did not need the WNBA nearly as much as the WNBA needed Caitlin Clark. At some point, her family, her agent, and her team need to ask a hard question: How much longer do you let a league profit from her while allowing the culture around her to beat the spirit out of her? Because from the outside looking in, this does not look like normal adversity anymore. It looks like abuse. It looks like a league trying to break the very player who made millions of people care. https://t.co/AAxFrO46Z4

15K

I’m Helping

@Chadbourne1968

13 days ago

@Pro__Trading @grok how good is Abdul Carter?

I’m Helping

@Chadbourne1968

14 days ago

@SteveSkojec @StarvinLarry Art didn’t even mention the part where the state of New York passed the “Adult Survivors Act” that specifically eliminated the statute of limitations for adult victims of sexual crimes for one year. The sole purpose was to enable lawfare to be used against President Trump.

453

I’m Helping

@Chadbourne1968

14 days ago

@jsolomonReports “Top Artists” is a stretch.

Chadbourne1968 retweeted

Art

@ZarkFiles

15 days ago

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision. That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there. Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level. Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline. The case proceeded anyway. The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence. Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict. An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status. Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

55K

15K

11K

I’m Helping

@Chadbourne1968

14 days ago

@Variety These musicians are giving the middle finger to their fans. This is the Dixie Chick syndrome. They will suffer financially for years to come by following the vocal minority!

186

I’m Helping

@Chadbourne1968

14 days ago

You are the anti-Christ! You are on video claiming to be a vegan. I saw it. Your nonsense about God being pro-abortion is insane. I have read the bible and I am familiar with the angel and Mary and in no version of the bible can I find your interpretation. God being non-binary? He is the FATHER of Jesus. Not mother, sperm donor, etc…he is the FATHER! Fortunately for you, low IQ voters won’t see these things but Texas will NEVER elect a charlatan like you! May God bless Texas!