Chaos SEO

This sentence is false.

Au revoir, Twitter.

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
https://t.co/2TQua3WyLo

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

What the fuck is this shit now, @Google?
https://t.co/VQ89M1JIBz

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

@priteshpatel9 Yeah I didn't really logged in here all for the better lol

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

Dafuq is this scam lol

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

@theSEOfairy @MarkPreston1969 @JohnMu I doubt Google cares about Black Hat / White Hat classification at all ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

@glenngabe @rustybrick Why not? They're usually after users' data, so it make sense for them to take a hit now, not lose market share (i.e. users' data), and figure out later how to monetize it.

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

@pedrodias TBF there are some paying customers there right now.

I know, I know - ToS and all that legal yadda-yadda, but with paid plan introduction optics changed a little bit IMHO.

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

@MarkPreston1969 @darth_na Yup, automation is just a tool - you don't need a fancy name to use it right.

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

@MarkPreston1969 This is what I see from the examples I've encountered.

And some years ago there was a debate if black hat is spam and one of the counter-arguments was "black hat is not only spam, but also automation", hence my, I admit tongue-in-cheek, statement :)

cc @darth_na

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

@darth_na @MarkPreston1969 I've never said that black hat is bad ;)

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

@MarkPreston1969 From what I've seen things like e.g. automating title and meta description generation - basically just automation whenever it's possible.

I'm yet to see an example which wouldn't fall into black hat / automation approach category :)

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

@darth_na @MarkPreston1969 Back in my day that was a part of black hat ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

@PeterMindenhall So just meta-tracker

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

Searching for any Snowpark docs right now is PITA @SnowflakeDB

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

@SnowflakeDB are you aware you've broken your Snowaprk API reference URLs?

E.g. https://t.co/Hwg6Z1DaIP

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

Judging from Archive's copy it's rather fresh issue (different URL, but old docs URL schema) https://t.co/u4hXgrDQxj

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

@semrush The communication is very clear and it's clear when you're exporting the file (msg in app - it's clear u get only 30k).

The problem is adding this msg to file might mess working with the file itself especially in automated pipelines (e.g. importing it elsewhere).

[Chaos SEO @ChaosSEO]

@semrush whose bright idea was adding this message to the bottom of exported files?

"You can export only first 30000 rows available for your subscription. To export more data, upgrade to a Business subscription plan. See plans and prices https://t.co/RIrv58gRiD"