Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, Iâm releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements within the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virusâ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. Itâs time you know the truth.
https://t.co/3YJSstB7d4
The WHO's claim that vaccines saved 154 million lives in the past 50 years is corrupt "science" at its apex.
This claim comes from an advertising report by the WHO touting its own vaccination program. In a real paper, there would be a confidence interval for the claimed â154 million lives saved.â The reason there is no confidence interval is that this figure is fabricated guesswork, as explainedâor I should say buriedâon page 42 of the supplement to this paper, in a section titled âUncertainty of estimates.â [1] There, it explains that it cannot put âbounds around the veracity of the estimatesâ and that any âbounds are arbitraryâ and âshould not be interpreted as a claim to where the edges of valid estimated possible [sic] lie.â Meaning, the confidence that any estimate in this paper is correct is zero and it could be just as true that vaccines resulted in a net death of 154 million lives in the last 50 years. That alone renders this study entirely unreliable, and claims made using this study corrupt.
But it gets worse. This claim also fails to account for studies with actual data about vaccines and mortality. For example, almost the entire 154 million lives the report claims were saved comes from two vaccines, the DTP vaccine and the measles vaccine.
As for the DTP vaccine, the body of science based on actual real-world data is clear: this vaccine kills more children than it saves. In fact, the seminal study found that children receiving DTP died at 10 times the rate as those who received no vaccines in the first six months of life. [2]. Ten times. That study is based on real data and has a confidence interval. The study found that DTP may have reduced deaths from the diseases it targeted (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) but children were dying from other diseases and issues that otherwise would not have been associated with vaccines, absent the study. Accounting for this real-world data would wipe away the entirety of the 154 million lives saved, if you calculated those lives lost from DTP use over the past 50 years.
As for the measles vaccine, this product can prevent transmission of measles, and so it can save some lives by preventing measles deaths. But that is not the entire story. First, this WHO advertising report estimates that 40% of the decline in measles mortality is due to measles vaccine. But this estimate defies reality. In the United States, measles mortality declined by over 98% before a measles vaccine was introduced in 1963 and declined by over 99% in the U.K. before a measles vaccine was introduced in 1968. [3]. As living conditions improve, the hard data reflects that measles mortality declines by close to 99%, not 60% as this WHO advertisement report used. Using the real data regarding reduction of measles mortality absent a vaccine when living conditions improve, and accounting for the DTP data discussed above, the benefit of vaccines over the last 50 years becomes inverted.
But it gets even worse. A 100,000-person study conducted by the nation of Japan over a period of over 20 years found that those who had measles and mumps died at a far lower rate from cardiovascular disease than those who never had measles and mumps. [4]. In fact, 20 years after the start of the study, around 14% of those who never had measles and mumps were dead of heart disease whereas only 7% of those who had measles and mumps were dead of heart disease. Heart disease is the number one killer of Americans. Not only does measles have a statistically significant reduction in deaths from heart disease, study after study shows having measles provides a statistically significant reduction in death from various cancers. [5].
Notably, these cardiovascular and cancer studies were based on real data, not estimates, provided confidence intervals, and were statistically significant. If you now add this data to the above about DTP and measles, you are far negative in terms of the benefits of vaccines. Consider that unlike other pathogens that have come and gone, these pathogens apparently conferred a survival advantage and hence may explain why they became less virulent over time and remained in circulation.
Bottom line, the WHOâs advertising report, masquerading as science, epitomizes the corruption of science regarding vaccines. Overstating the benefits of vaccines is just as dangerous as overstating their risks. Doing so deprives the policy makers, medical professionals, and the public of the ability to make rational, informed, decisions regarding these products.
The above is an abridged discussion of this topic. For an illuminating, detailed, and fully cited discussion showing that the claimed reduction in mortality from vaccines is a belief, not science, see Chapter 7 of Vaccines, Amen.
[1] https://t.co/ydDsHklQ3A
[2] https://t.co/3zoc6Q0VkL see Chapter 7 of Vaccines, Amen for full discussion and additional citations.
[3] https://t.co/se5EeTopTZ; https://t.co/2kmWpDhoDO; and see Chapter 7 of Vaccines, Amen for full discussion and additional citations.
[4] https://t.co/eV3ud0LjmH
[5] For example, the International Agency for Research on Cancer found that those who never had measles had a 66% increased rate of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and a 233% increased rate of Hodgkin lymphoma. https://t.co/HoAOtTPANy(See Table 2: in the Non-Hodgkinâs Lymphoma (NHL) column, divide the odds ratio 1 (never had measles) with .6 (had measles) which results in a 66% increased risk, and in the Hodgkinâs Lymphoma (HL) column, divide the odds ratio 1 (never had measles) with .3 (had measles) which results in a 233% increased risk). These two cancers killed an estimated 21,170 Americans in 2022 (see https://t.co/U8AXKsWmbh https://t.co/Ki1w7v0rKs). There are event studies that found remission of Hodgkinâs disease after having measles (see https://t.co/5nBRB3zpDi). Likewise, researchers at the Department of Health Care and Epidemiology at the University of British Columbia and the Department of Biology at the University of Victoria found that those who never had measles had a 50% increased rate of ovarian cancer, which killed an estimated 12,810 Americans in 2022 (see https://t.co/fDL74igeIt https://t.co/hkxsUOwLQk). Other studies have reached similar conclusions that measlesâas well as mumps, rubella, chickenpox, etc.âreduce the rate of various forms of other cancers, including a study from researchers at the University of Berne, Switzerland that specifically reviewed these fever-causing illnesses and found that the âstudy consistently revealed a lower cancer risk for patients with a history of FICD [febrile infectious childhood diseases]â (see https://t.co/eG2xhhVAUh). Studies have also found that children who have had measles have far less allergies and atopic diseases, such as asthma, and adults who had measles have a reduced risk of Parkinsonâs Disease (see https://t.co/IJqoNEoeeR; https://t.co/AVoUNOBTw5 https://t.co/8J76GzRFQ8).
Someone posted in my comment section that they hope our children are taken away from us, if we donât vaccinate them. They also want us in âjail for neglect.â My message to them, and everyone else⊠from the back of an ambulance.
Note: I make these videos at great risk to myself and livelihood. If Iâm going to continue putting myself at risk, Iâd appreciate it if youâd share. So my sacrifice is not in vain.
Thank you
God bless