My biggest concern is that if there is a clean sweep by Democrats of the House, Senate and Presidency in 2028, they will:
1. Make DC and Puerto Rico states to gain a strong majority in the Senate.
2. Open the borders and legalize everyone living in America illegally to cement a permanent majority.
3. Increase the size of the Supreme Court to gain an immediate majority.
This would result in America becoming a permanent one-party state and the end of democracy in any meaningful sense of the word.
All that is needed to ensure this doesn’t happen is 51 Republican senators in 2029. That is why you should vote for Republican senators this election. Other reasons are irrelevant compared to this one.
Very few Americans realize that, if Trump is NOT elected, this will be the last election. Far from being a threat to democracy, he is the only way to save it!
Let me explain: if even 1 in 20 illegals become citizens per year, something that the Democrats are expediting as fast as humanly possible, that would be about 2 million new legal voters in 4 years.
The voting margin in the swing states is often less than 20 thousand votes. That means if the “Democratic” Party succeeds, there will be no more swing states!!
Moreover, the Biden/Harris administration has been flying “asylum seekers”, who are fast-tracked to citizenship, directly into swing states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin and Arizona. It is a surefire way to win every election.
America then becomes a one-party state and Democracy is over. The only “elections” will be the Democratic Party primaries. This already happened in California many years ago, following the 1986 amnesty.
The only thing holding California back from extreme socialism and suffocating government policies is that people can leave California and still remain in America. Once the whole country is controlled by one party, there will be no escape.
Everywhere in America will be like the nightmare that is downtown San Francisco.
This admission is very surprising and a positive step forward.
NPR editor rebukes own outlet's coverage of Hunter Biden laptop, COVID lab leak and Russiagate
https://t.co/AwN1d1jUeJ
Americans who support Trump are often labeled as 'cult members' by some on the left, primarily because they see through the game and are not moved by the court cases or media attacks. Yes, no one wants a conman who inflates the value of their assets while pretending to be a rich man. However, if we are to be completely honest, even those who hate Trump would ask, how can a bank just grant a loan to a business or a man based only on their words? Don't banks do their own asset appraisal or asset valuation? If this man has been committing fraud for decades, why wait until he's running for President? Why not expose him many years ago? By the way, if it's that easy to get loans from banks, why not go after all the businesspeople in New York who have done the same thing?
And if that man mishandled classified documents and his opponent mishandled classified documents, why go after one and let the other off the hook? Is that fair? Is that the great justice system in the United States?
Many of the people who support Trump may not even agree with him on everything; they may not even post some messages that he posts, but they see through the double standard, the game to exclude him, the tricks being used by one side to dominate the other side, and they stick with him.
Yes, many people who follow him do not have private jets, they know he's not living paycheck to paycheck, he's not going through what they are going through, and may not even understand what life is like for a construction worker or a farmer, even when he may claim that he knows, but they believe he is the best choice for them to solve their problems, to move the country forward.
Above all, they understand that the opposition targets him not because he may have committed fraud for years or allegedly lived a false, fabricated life for decades, but because of the election, the support he still enjoys among his followers, and his prospects of winning the next election. They see through the maneuvering and remain loyal to their chosen leader, even at the risk of being labeled as cult members for following their conscience.
Sunday's #poll closed with 78.2% of 22,836 voters saying that U.S. SHOULD close its #SouthernBorder now, until a comprehensive #immigration plan is agreed upon.
Do you agree?
Vote on today's poll as well! 🗳️ https://t.co/nAmCcDSvmO
Alsu Kurmasheva, a journalist for Radio Free Europe @RFERL, was detained by Russian authorities on October 18. On December 1, Alsu’s pre-trial detention was extended until February 5, 2024. Her unjust detention must end. #FreeAlsu
https://t.co/OjXCVRMmbu
The presidents of @Harvard, @MIT, and @Penn were all asked the following question under oath at today’s congressional hearing on antisemitism:
Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate [your university’s] code of conduct or rules regarding bullying or harassment?
The answers they gave reflect the profound moral bankruptcy of Presidents Gay, Magill and Kornbluth.
Representative @EliseStefanik was so shocked with the answers that she asked each of them the same question over and over again, and they gave the same answers over and over again.
In short, they said:
It ‘depends on the context’ and ‘whether the speech turns into conduct,’ that is, actually killing Jews.
This could be the most extraordinary testimony ever elicited in the Congress, certainly on the topic of genocide, which to remind us all is:
“the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group”
The presidents’ answers reflect the profound educational, moral and ethical failures that pervade certain of our elite educational institutions due in large part to their failed leadership.
Don’t take my word for it.
You must watch the following three minutes. By the end, you will be where I am.
They must all resign in disgrace.
If a CEO of one of our companies gave a similar answer, he or she would be toast within the hour.
Why has antisemitism exploded on campus and around the world?
Because of leaders like Presidents Gay, Magill and Kornbluth who believe genocide depends on the context.
To think that these are the leaders of Ivy League institutions that are charged with the responsibility to educate our best and brightest.
On the bright side, our congressional leaders deserve accolades for showing tremendous leadership and moral clarity in their statements, by the questions they asked, and the respectfulness with which they conducted the hearing.
It was a masterclass of how our government and democracy should operate.
If you have time, please watch the entire hearing. Throughout the hearing, the three behaved like hostile witnesses, exhibiting a profound disdain for the Congress with their smiles and smirks, and their outright refusal to answer basic questions with a yes or no answer.