🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ

I tweet therefore I am.

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@diringgin @docelmer63 @fdposa @ogie_rosa Yes. And u think the best way to protect children is by stigmatizing children as well-- and the lawyers who u HARSHLY judged to be bad parents just because they think the crime is hypothetical. I get it.

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@ogie_rosa @diringgin @docelmer63 @fdposa @dippedincheeese Hahaha! U got me. 🤣 Nakakatawa kasi mga sagot mo e. Sarap barahin. Yung akala mo solid yung argument mo pero actually ka-bara bara sya 🤣 Buti pa si JG, may sense ang rebuttals. Pero last na talaga to. Ignore ko na mga mema replies mo. Pwamis ☺️

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@diringgin @docelmer63 @fdposa @ogie_rosa Judge them as enablers, by all means. But don't judge them as parents (and then stigmatized their kids as well. The same kids u claim to protect).

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@ogie_rosa @diringgin @docelmer63 @fdposa @dippedincheeese Oh no. That throne belongs to u ☺️ but I wonder, if u don't want to see me, why do u keep on replying to replies not even for u? Dude, u have nothing new to say, as far as this thread is concerned. Which is why I already stopped replying to u directly. & this shall be the last.👋

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@diringgin @ogie_rosa @docelmer63 @fdposa He can reply all he wants, ghorl. It's his wall, after all. But he shouldn't go around saying he "couldn't care less" or that I "don't exist" when his continued replies show otherwise. Ok na ba?

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@ogie_rosa @diringgin @docelmer63 @fdposa @dippedincheeese Really? U who even made a thread for my tweet? 🤣 And u who kept on replying to my replies for others even tho I was done talking to u. Anyway, dippedincheese must be the one who commented and then blocked me so I can't reply. Coward ☺️

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@diringgin @docelmer63 @fdposa @ogie_rosa Oh, u said it. Incomplete. Like I said, not exhaustive doesn't mean not objective. Ghorl, there's a loophole as big as Luzon. ☺️

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@diringgin @docelmer63 @fdposa @ogie_rosa I didn't reply to the initial tweet, ghorl. I replied to urs judging these lawyers as unfit parents.
Lawyers' job is to "defend" ghorl. Kung lulusot because the law has loopholes, perhaps we should look at the law. Don't u think?

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@ogie_rosa @docelmer63 @diringgin @fdposa Aysus, hindi na naman naintindihan 🤦‍♀️😂😂😂

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@diringgin @docelmer63 @fdposa @ogie_rosa And find loopholes in the law, just because 'you and the NBI have discussed' (lol) how he can be held liable.

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@diringgin @docelmer63 @fdposa @ogie_rosa Nor is there official pronouncement of his incrimination. It's all academic at this point ghorl. So IDK why u would discredit the opinion of the lawyers (and call them bad parents for it) just to put weight on ur opinion. The case is not for the NBI or u to try nor decide on, 1/

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@docelmer63 @diringgin @fdposa @ogie_rosa Sigh. Maybe u should read everything first. Start with the man's statement, then Sharon's, and then have a look at atty nangit's response. To say that there is no law that allows people to threaten others is too simplistic. Pls read everything first.

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@docelmer63 @diringgin @fdposa @ogie_rosa Uhm, I didn't say Sharon has actions that were against the law. I refer to her post and her threats to sue when I said "she can't do." If ur following this thread, except for her exact post, the lawyer's FB post on it is somewhere here in the thread.

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@ogie_rosa @diringgin @fdposa @docelmer63 Yep. Nabutata. There goes ur excuse again for missing the point actually. 😊

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@coolnawzm @JuliaMyuki @ZeGeek10 @nicoletteannmc Wala 😂. Sa followers nya lang meron 🤣🤣🤣.

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@diringgin @docelmer63 @fdposa @ogie_rosa I wasn't defending his statement. I find it crude and uncultured (as Sharon's response was, if I may say so).
The lawyers weren't defending his statement so he could escape the law. The law was what made him escape it. Don't u get it?

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@ogie_rosa @diringgin @fdposa @docelmer63 And who are u to question the objectivity of the interpretation or my "expertise" when u urself latched on the word KUNG and missed the context? I'd say, the same way u missed the point of my argument& kept saying "butata" when in fact, u simply have a low reading compre 😊

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@diringgin @fdposa @docelmer63 @ogie_rosa I'm glad u mentioned "exhaustive," bec ghorl, exhaustive does not equate to objective. U want an exhaustive take on what Sharon can file instead, not what she CAN'T do under the law. It wasn't just abt her rage, ghorl. The post included why her rage was all talk and "no law."

[🌸 Chell 🌸 ᴹᵃᶦⁿᵉ @Chell1023]

@ogie_rosa Sows, hindi mo na naman naintindihan🤦‍♀️😂 where exactly did I say wag magsalita? I said, don't harshly judge the lawyers and call them bad parents (whose children must be avoided) just because they interpreted the law objectively. U keep proving how bad ur reading compre is. 🤣SMH