@kezgidz@SenSanders I’m also curious about your thoughts on IVF. Doctors literally combine the sperm and egg which begins the cell division. They then insert it into the uterus in hopes that it will stick. And this can fail multiple times. What about this? Isn’t this murder?
@kezgidz@SenSanders If the woman miscarried and is upset about it, it’s because she personally had a connection to that pregnancy and desired it. If I had a miscarriage I would not be upset, as I do not want children. It’s all about your perspective. A woman who wants children would most likely not
@kezgidz@SenSanders have an abortion because she obviously wants it. At the beginning stages it literally is a bunch of cells. And while I wouldn’t say that to someone who miscarried, it’s still the truth (depending on how far you are).
@kezgidz@SenSanders If you detached the umbilical cord while still in the womb, the fetus would not survive because it needs its host. It’s not developed enough to be a living organism on its own, so no it’s not a living breathing child.
@kezgidz@SenSanders You don’t want women who can’t afford children to get an abortion, and yet you don’t want to help them. Lol. It makes absolutely no sense.
@kezgidz@SenSanders You act as if birth control doesn’t ever fail and that everyone is just having sex with no protection. No birth control is 100%, unless a woman gets her ovaries completely removed or a man no longer has his testes.
@kezgidz@SenSanders A fetus in the womb isn’t a child. A child who is actually alive and breathing has the right to life. Pro-life people aren’t actually pro-life; they are pro-birth. They only care about whether or not the woman has birth. After that they don’t care about the kid. If you were -
@kezgidz@SenSanders really concerned with the children once they were born then you wouldn’t want to take away benefits that help said child, such as SNAP or WIC benefits. But instead, most republicans want to get rid of these things. Makes no sense to me. The child then has to suffer.